Chow A W, Bednorz D
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Nov;14(5):668-71. doi: 10.1128/AAC.14.5.668.
The in vitro susceptibilities of 408 recent clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria against cefaclor, cephalexin, cephalothin, cefazolin, cefamandole, and cefoxitin were compared by an agar dilution technique. Against gram-positive bacteria, especially peptococci, peptostreptococci, and propionibacteria, cephalexin and cefaclor were significantly less active than cephalothin (P < 0.05). Cephalexin was also less active than cephalothin against clostridia and lactobacillus (P < 0.05). Against gram-negative bacteria, major differences were observed primarily with Bacteroides fragilis, against which cephalexin, cefazolin and cefoxitin were all significantly more active than cephalothin (P < 0.001). At concentrations of 16 mug per ml, however, all cephalosporins showed high in vitro activity, except against Lactobacillus species and B. fragilis. Cephalothin, cefazolin and cefamandole were considerably more active against the former, whereas cefoxitin was distinctly more active against the latter.
采用琼脂稀释法比较了408株近期临床分离厌氧菌对头孢克洛、头孢氨苄、头孢噻吩、头孢唑林、头孢孟多和头孢西丁的体外敏感性。对于革兰氏阳性菌,尤其是消化球菌、消化链球菌和丙酸杆菌,头孢氨苄和头孢克洛的活性明显低于头孢噻吩(P<0.05)。头孢氨苄对梭菌和乳酸杆菌的活性也低于头孢噻吩(P<0.05)。对于革兰氏阴性菌,主要在脆弱拟杆菌中观察到显著差异,头孢氨苄、头孢唑林和头孢西丁对其活性均明显高于头孢噻吩(P<0.001)。然而,在每毫升16微克的浓度下,除乳酸杆菌属和脆弱拟杆菌外,所有头孢菌素均显示出较高的体外活性。头孢噻吩、头孢唑林和头孢孟多对前者的活性明显更高,而头孢西丁对后者的活性明显更高。