Suppr超能文献

喹诺酮类药物治疗人类布鲁氏菌病:氧氟沙星-利福平与强力霉素-利福平的对比试验

Quinolones in treatment of human brucellosis: comparative trial of ofloxacin-rifampin versus doxycycline-rifampin.

作者信息

Akova M, Uzun O, Akalin H E, Hayran M, Unal S, Gür D

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Sep;37(9):1831-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.9.1831.

Abstract

Quinolones have been reported to be active against Brucella species in vitro. In this prospective randomized study, the efficacy and safety of the combination of ofloxacin plus rifampin were compared with the efficacy and safety of doxycycline plus rifampin, both combinations administered for a 6-week period in treatment of brucellosis. Sixty-one patients were enrolled in the study, and 49 had blood or bone marrow cultures positive for Brucella melitensis. Thirty patients received 200 mg of doxycycline plus 600 mg of rifampin once daily, and 31 patients were treated with 400 mg of ofloxacin plus 600 mg of rifampin once daily for 6 weeks. Nine patients in each group had complications of the disease. There was one therapeutic failure in the ofloxacin-rifampin treatment group, and one patient from each group relapsed (3.3% of those in the doxycycline-rifampin treatment group versus 3.2% of those in the ofloxacin-rifampin treatment group). Gastric discomfort was the major side effect observed in 13 patients (43.3%) who received doxycycline plus rifampin, whereas only 2 patients (6.5%) treated with ofloxacin plus rifampin complained of gastric irritation. These results suggest that the combination of ofloxacin plus rifampin administered for 6 weeks is as effective as doxycycline plus rifampin given for the same period, regardless of the presence of complications of the disease.

摘要

据报道,喹诺酮类药物在体外对布鲁氏菌具有活性。在这项前瞻性随机研究中,将氧氟沙星加利福平联合用药的疗效和安全性与强力霉素加rifampin的疗效和安全性进行了比较,两种联合用药均为期6周,用于治疗布鲁氏菌病。61名患者参与了该研究,其中49人的血液或骨髓培养物中布鲁氏菌呈阳性。30名患者每天接受200毫克强力霉素加600毫克rifampin治疗,31名患者每天接受400毫克氧氟沙星加600毫克rifampin治疗,为期6周。每组有9名患者出现疾病并发症。氧氟沙星-利福平治疗组有1例治疗失败,每组各有1例患者复发(强力霉素-利福平治疗组的复发率为3.3%,氧氟沙星-利福平治疗组的复发率为3.2%)。胃部不适是接受强力霉素加rifampin治疗的13名患者(43.3%)中观察到的主要副作用,而接受氧氟沙星加rifampin治疗的患者中只有2名(6.5%)抱怨有胃部刺激。这些结果表明,无论疾病是否存在并发症,氧氟沙星加rifampin联合用药6周与同期使用强力霉素加rifampin的效果相同。

相似文献

1
Quinolones in treatment of human brucellosis: comparative trial of ofloxacin-rifampin versus doxycycline-rifampin.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Sep;37(9):1831-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.9.1831.
5
Comparison of three different combination therapies in the treatment of human brucellosis.
Trop Doct. 2005 Oct;35(4):210-2. doi: 10.1258/004947505774938765.
6
Comparative trial of rifampin-doxycycline versus tetracycline-streptomycin in the therapy of human brucellosis.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985 Oct;28(4):548-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.4.548.

引用本文的文献

1
Unravelling the challenge of cotrimoxazole and rifampin resistance in B. melitensis and B. abortus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Dec 2;18(12):e0012630. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012630. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Efficacy and safety of therapeutic strategies for human brucellosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Mar 11;18(3):e0012010. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012010. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
The current therapeutical strategies in human brucellosis.
Infection. 2021 Oct;49(5):823-832. doi: 10.1007/s15010-021-01586-w. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
6
Antibiotics for treating human brucellosis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD007179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007179.pub2.
7
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032090. Epub 2012 Feb 29.
8
In vitro susceptibilities of Brucella melitensis isolates to eleven antibiotics.
Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006 Oct 2;5:24. doi: 10.1186/1476-0711-5-24.
10
Quinolones for treatment of human brucellosis: critical review of the evidence from microbiological and clinical studies.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jan;50(1):22-33. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.1.22-33.2006.

本文引用的文献

1
Laboratory diagnosis of brucellosis in man.
Bull World Health Organ. 1961;24(1):73-84.
2
Oxytetracycline-streptomycin therapy in brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis.
AMA Arch Intern Med. 1953 Feb;91(2):204-11. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1953.00240140064005.
3
Brucellosis treated with rifampicin.
Arch Dis Child. 1980 Jun;55(6):486-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.55.6.486.
4
In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against Brucella melitensis.
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1984 Aug;3(4):371. doi: 10.1007/BF01977500.
9
Failure of prolonged treatment with ciprofloxacin in acute infections due to Brucella melitensis.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Dec;26(6):841-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.6.841.
10
Lack of effective bactericidal activity of new quinolones against Brucella spp.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991 Apr;35(4):756-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.4.756.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验