Bradley J
Indiana University School of Library and Information Science at Indianapolis 46202-5195, USA.
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1996 Jan;84(1):1-10.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the changes in health information and health information work using a conceptual framework and to consider the implication of these changes for health sciences librarians. The notion of what constitutes information depends heavily on the perspective of those defining the term. In the health care domain, numerous established concepts of information exist, many clustering around disciplines and professions. Various information professions-for example, health sciences librarians, information-systems managers, and medical-records administrators--have differing core concepts of information. Although these established concepts of information may seem immutable, they are cultural facts and can and do change. Global networking and changes in health care delivery are just two of many environmental forces that are changing the way the health domain views health information and the way it values the patterns and practices traditionally associated with established types of information and information professions. As new concepts of information arise, the possibility for new expert work surrounding information also arises. Andrew Abbott's systems theory of professions, adapted to the health domain, suggests that some forms of established expert information work may diminish while new types may arise and that both established and new information professions will struggle with each other for official sanction, or jurisdiction, to perform new expert work. This competitive struggle is likely to produce a new balance of information work and roles among the information professions. The specialty areas of library and information science, the heartland of our knowledge base, are as relevant in the electronic environment as in the print environment. Our profession's challenge now is to redefine and communicate our jurisdictional place in the emerging health information environment.
本文旨在运用一个概念框架审视健康信息及健康信息工作的变化,并思考这些变化对健康科学图书馆员的影响。信息的构成概念在很大程度上取决于定义该术语的人的视角。在医疗保健领域,存在着众多既定的信息概念,其中许多围绕学科和专业聚类。各种信息专业人士——例如,健康科学图书馆员、信息系统经理和医疗记录管理员——对信息有着不同的核心概念。尽管这些既定的信息概念看似一成不变,但它们是文化事实,能够且确实在发生变化。全球网络和医疗保健服务的变化只是众多环境力量中的两个,它们正在改变健康领域看待健康信息的方式以及重视与既定信息类型和信息专业传统相关的模式和实践的方式。随着新的信息概念的出现,围绕信息的新的专家工作的可能性也随之出现。安德鲁·阿伯特的职业系统理论,适用于健康领域,表明一些既定的专家信息工作形式可能会减少,而新的类型可能会出现,并且既定的和新的信息专业都将为开展新的专家工作的官方认可或管辖权而相互竞争。这种竞争很可能会在信息专业之间产生信息工作和角色的新平衡。图书馆与信息科学的专业领域,作为我们知识库的核心地带,在电子环境中与印刷环境中同样重要。我们这个职业目前面临的挑战是在新兴的健康信息环境中重新定义并传达我们的管辖范围。