Erickson S, Feldman S S, Steiner H
Department of Psychiatry, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305-5540, USA.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 1997 Fall;28(1):45-56. doi: 10.1023/a:1025145119301.
In exploring the relationship between defense reactions and coping strategies in a non-clinic sample of adolescents (N = 81), we assessed: defense structure by the Bond Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ); coping behaviors by the Coping Responses Inventory-Youth Form (CRI-Youth); and general adjustment by Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) ratings. Defense reactions and coping strategies were modestly associated and made independent contributions in predicting the GAF. Mature and immature defenses and avoidance coping comprised the optimal combination in predicting the GAF, accounting for 20% of GAF variance. It is therefore important to assess both unconscious and conscious processes when assessing general functioning in normal adolescents.
在对一个非临床青少年样本（N = 81）的防御反应与应对策略之间的关系进行探究时，我们进行了以下评估：通过《邦德防御方式问卷》（DSQ）评估防御结构；通过《应对反应量表 - 青少年版》（CRI - Youth）评估应对行为；通过总体功能评估（GAF）评分评估总体适应情况。防御反应和应对策略存在适度关联，且在预测GAF时做出了独立贡献。成熟和不成熟防御以及回避应对构成了预测GAF的最佳组合，占GAF方差的20%。因此，在评估正常青少年的总体功能时，同时评估无意识和有意识过程很重要。
