• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人格结构中的年龄差异:一种聚类分析方法。

Age differences in personality structure: a cluster analytic approach.

作者信息

Costa P T, McCrae R R

出版信息

J Gerontol. 1976 Sep;31(5):564-70. doi: 10.1093/geronj/31.5.564.

DOI:10.1093/geronj/31.5.564
PMID:950450
Abstract

A cluster analytic approach was used to determine possible age differences in the structure of personality as measured by the Cattell Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. Subjects were 969 adult male volunteers, originally divided into three groups: 25 to 34, 35 to 54, and 55 to 82. Two familiar dimensions of personality, Anxiety-Adjustment and Introversion-Extraversion, were found to be cross sectionally stable. A third cluster dimension, interpreted as openness to experience, showed age-related differences. Young subjects showed openness to feelings; middle-aged subjects showed openness to ideas; and old subjects showed a balanced openness to both feelings and ideas. Repartitioning of the sample into two groups (ages 25 to 43 and 44 to 82), and three groups (25 to 39, 40 to 47, and 48 to 82) confirmed these age differences in the third cluster. The interpretation of the third cluster is discussed in terms of Jung's concepts of psychological functions.

摘要

采用聚类分析方法,以卡特尔十六种人格因素问卷来确定人格结构中可能存在的年龄差异。研究对象为969名成年男性志愿者,最初分为三组:25至34岁、35至54岁、55至82岁。研究发现,人格的两个常见维度,即焦虑-适应和内向-外向,在横截面上是稳定的。第三个聚类维度被解释为对经验的开放性,呈现出与年龄相关的差异。年轻受试者表现出对情感的开放性;中年受试者表现出对思想的开放性;老年受试者则表现出对情感和思想的平衡开放性。将样本重新划分为两组(25至43岁和44至82岁)以及三组(25至39岁、40至47岁和48至82岁),证实了第三个聚类中存在的这些年龄差异。并依据荣格的心理功能概念对第三个聚类的解释进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Age differences in personality structure: a cluster analytic approach.人格结构中的年龄差异:一种聚类分析方法。
J Gerontol. 1976 Sep;31(5):564-70. doi: 10.1093/geronj/31.5.564.
2
Anxiety and depressive disorders and the five-factor model of personality: a higher- and lower-order personality trait investigation in a community sample.焦虑和抑郁障碍与人格五因素模型:社区样本中的高阶和低阶人格特质调查
Depress Anxiety. 2004;20(2):92-7. doi: 10.1002/da.20026.
3
Age differences in personality structure revisited: Studies in validity, stability, and change.重新审视人格结构中的年龄差异:效度、稳定性和变化研究
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1977;8(4):261-75. doi: 10.2190/awyd-qt2l-wvnm-4f98.
4
Relations of age and personality dimensions to cognitive ability factors.年龄和人格维度与认知能力因素的关系。
J Gerontol. 1976 Nov;31(6):663-9. doi: 10.1093/geronj/31.6.663.
5
The relationship of social anxiety disorder symptoms with probable attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in Turkish university students; impact of negative affect and personality traits of neuroticism and extraversion.土耳其大学生社交焦虑障碍症状与可能的注意缺陷多动障碍的关系;负性情绪和神经质、外向性格特质的影响。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Aug;254:158-163. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.04.039. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
6
Elucidating the relationship between noise sensitivity and personality.阐明噪声敏感性与个性之间的关系。
Noise Health. 2015 May-Jun;17(76):165-71. doi: 10.4103/1463-1741.155850.
7
The California Psychological Inventory and the Semantic Differential dimensions.
J Gen Psychol. 1976 Jan;94(1st Half):129-34. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1976.9711598.
8
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
9
Anxiety and locus of conflict in emotionally disturbed children.情绪障碍儿童的焦虑与冲突源
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1974 Mar;2(1):33-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00919351.
10
Anxious, introverted personality traits in patients with chronic subjective dizziness.慢性主观性头晕患者的焦虑、内向人格特质。
J Psychosom Res. 2014 Jan;76(1):80-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.11.008. Epub 2013 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and implementation of an EEG-based recognition mechanism for the openness trait of the Big Five.基于脑电图的大五人格开放性特质识别机制的设计与实现
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 7;16:926256. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.926256. eCollection 2022.
2
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Teacher Personality on Teacher Effectiveness and Burnout.教师个性对教学效能和职业倦怠影响的元分析
Educ Psychol Rev. 2019;31(1):163-195. doi: 10.1007/s10648-018-9458-2. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
3
Analysis of Sociodemographic, Psychological, and Genetic Factors Contributing to Depressive symptoms in Pre-, Peri- and Postmenopausal Women.
分析导致绝经前、围绝经期和绝经后妇女出现抑郁症状的社会人口学、心理和遗传因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 10;15(4):712. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040712.
4
Analysis of personality traits and their influence on the quality of life of postmenopausal women with regard to genetic factors.关于遗传因素对绝经后女性人格特质及其对生活质量影响的分析。
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2016 Sep 8;15(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12991-016-0110-6. eCollection 2016.
5
The assessment of the relationship between personality, the presence of the 5HTT and MAO-A polymorphisms, and the severity of climacteric and depressive symptoms in postmenopausal women.对绝经后女性人格、5-羟色胺转运体(5HTT)和单胺氧化酶A(MAO-A)基因多态性的存在与更年期及抑郁症状严重程度之间关系的评估。
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2015 Aug;18(4):613-21. doi: 10.1007/s00737-015-0497-0. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
6
Effects of socio-demographic, personality and medical factors on quality of life of postmenopausal women.社会人口学、人格和医学因素对绝经后妇女生活质量的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jun 26;11(7):6692-708. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110706692.
7
Personality as a Source of Individual Differences in Cognition among Older African Americans.人格作为老年非裔美国人认知个体差异的一个来源。
J Res Pers. 2012 Oct 1;46(5):465-471. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2012.04.006.
8
Factorial validity of the Texas Revised Inventory of Grief-Present scale among bereaved older adults.丧亲老年人 Texas 修订版悲痛量表-现量表的因子有效性。
Psychol Assess. 2010 Sep;22(3):675-87. doi: 10.1037/a0019914.
9
A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis.五因素模型与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)人格障碍之间关系的元分析综述:层面水平分析
Clin Psychol Rev. 2008 Dec;28(8):1326-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.07.002. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
10
Effects of dentition status and personality on masticatory performance and food acceptability.牙列状况和个性对咀嚼性能及食物可接受性的影响。
Dysphagia. 1989;4(2):121-6. doi: 10.1007/BF02407157.