• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与克林霉素、红霉素和甲硝唑相比,交沙霉素和蔷薇霉素对脆弱拟杆菌的体外活性。

In vitro activity of josamycin and rosamicin against Bacteroides fragilis compared with clindamycin, erythromycin, and metronidazole.

作者信息

Santoro J, Kaye D, Levison M E

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Jul;10(1):188-90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.1.188.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.10.1.188
PMID:984752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC429713/
Abstract

The inhibitory and bactericidal activities of josamycin and rosamicin against 29 clinical isolates of Bacteroides fragilis were compared with those of clindamycin, erythromycin, and metronidazole by a broth dilution technique. Josamycin and rosamicin had similar inhibitory activity to metronidazole and clindamycin. Rosamicin had similar bactericidal activity to clindamycin but was less bactericidal than metronidazole (the most bactericidal agent tested). Josamycin was slightly more bactericidal than erythromycin (the least bactericidal agent tested), but less so than rosamicin and clindamycin.

摘要

采用肉汤稀释技术,将交沙霉素和蔷薇霉素对29株脆弱拟杆菌临床分离株的抑制和杀菌活性与克林霉素、红霉素和甲硝唑进行了比较。交沙霉素和蔷薇霉素对甲硝唑和克林霉素具有相似的抑制活性。蔷薇霉素与克林霉素具有相似的杀菌活性,但杀菌活性低于甲硝唑(所测试的杀菌活性最强的药物)。交沙霉素的杀菌活性略高于红霉素(所测试的杀菌活性最弱的药物),但低于蔷薇霉素和克林霉素。

相似文献

1
In vitro activity of josamycin and rosamicin against Bacteroides fragilis compared with clindamycin, erythromycin, and metronidazole.与克林霉素、红霉素和甲硝唑相比,交沙霉素和蔷薇霉素对脆弱拟杆菌的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Jul;10(1):188-90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.1.188.
2
In vitro activity and clinical efficacy of clindamycin in the treatment of infections due to anaerobic bacteria.克林霉素治疗厌氧菌感染的体外活性及临床疗效
J Infect Dis. 1977 Mar;135 Suppl:S49-53. doi: 10.1093/infdis/135.supplement.s49.
3
Josamycin and rosamicin: in vitro comparisons with erythromycin and clindamycin.交沙霉素和蔷薇霉素:与红霉素和克林霉素的体外比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Oct;10(4):773-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.10.4.773.
4
In vitro activity of rosamicin, josamycin, erythromycin, and clindamycin against beta-lactamase-nagative and beta-lactamase-positive strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.蔷薇霉素、交沙霉素、红霉素和克林霉素对淋病奈瑟菌β-内酰胺酶阴性和β-内酰胺酶阳性菌株的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Feb;15(2):243-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.15.2.243.
5
In vitro activity of josamycin against aerobic gram-positive cocci and anaerobes.交沙霉素对需氧革兰氏阳性球菌和厌氧菌的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Jun;9(6):988-93. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.6.988.
6
Potentially synergistic antimicrobial combinations with metronidazole against Bacteroides fragilis.与甲硝唑联用对脆弱拟杆菌可能具有协同抗菌作用的组合。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1980 Mar;17(3):379-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.17.3.379.
7
Comparison of the bactericidal activity of clindamycin and metronidazole against cefoxitin-susceptible and cefoxitin-resistant isolates of the Bacteroides fragilis group.克林霉素和甲硝唑对脆弱拟杆菌群中对头孢西丁敏感及耐药菌株的杀菌活性比较。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;14(5):377-82. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(91)90064-m.
8
[Activity of seven antimicrobial agents against "Bacteroides fragilis" (author's transl)].七种抗菌剂对脆弱拟杆菌的活性(作者译)
Ann Microbiol (Paris). 1980 Jan-Feb;131(1):39-44.
9
A comparison of the in vitro activity of rosamicin, erythromycin, clindamycin, metroidazole and ornidazole against Haemophilus ducreyi, including beta-lactamase producing strains.罗沙米星、红霉素、克林霉素、甲硝唑和奥硝唑对杜克雷嗜血杆菌(包括产β-内酰胺酶菌株)的体外活性比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1979 Nov;5(6):731-4. doi: 10.1093/jac/5.6.731.
10
In vitro susceptibility studies with josamycin and erythromycin.交沙霉素和红霉素的体外药敏研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Mar;9(3):546-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.3.546.

引用本文的文献

1
In vitro susceptibility of 30 strains of Chlamydia trachomatis to rosamicin.30株沙眼衣原体对蔷薇霉素的体外敏感性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Sep;14(3):493-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.14.3.493.
2
In vitro activity of rosamicin and erythromycin against a group of nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli.罗沙米星和红霉素对一组非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌的体外活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1978 Aug;14(2):274-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.14.2.274.
3
In vitro susceptibility of Ureaplasma urealyticum to rosaramicin.解脲脲原体对罗沙米星的体外敏感性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Jul;16(1):106-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.16.1.106.
4
Metronidazole in anaerobic infections: a review of its activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use.甲硝唑在厌氧菌感染中的应用:对其活性、药代动力学及治疗用途的综述
Drugs. 1978 Nov;16(5):387-417. doi: 10.2165/00003495-197816050-00002.
5
Activity of semisynthetic penicillins and synergism with mecillinam against Bacteroides species.半合成青霉素的活性及其与美西林对拟杆菌属细菌的协同作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979 Sep;16(3):283-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.16.3.283.

本文引用的文献

1
Bactericidal activity of five antimicrobial agents against Bacteroides fragilis.五种抗菌剂对脆弱拟杆菌的杀菌活性。
J Infect Dis. 1972 Jul;126(1):104-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/126.1.104.
2
Metronidazole versus anaerobes. In vitro data and initial clinical observations.甲硝唑与厌氧菌。体外数据及初步临床观察。
Calif Med. 1972 Dec;117(6):22-6.
3
Treatment of anaerobic bacterial infections with clindamycin-2-phosphate.用磷酸克林霉素治疗厌氧细菌感染。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Mar;5(3):276-80. doi: 10.1128/AAC.5.3.276.
4
Rosamicin: in vitro activity against anaerobes and comparison with erythromycin.蔷薇霉素:对厌氧菌的体外活性及与红霉素的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Feb;9(2):350-1. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.2.350.
5
Antibiotic susceptibility of the subspecies of Bacteroides fragilis.脆弱拟杆菌亚种的抗生素敏感性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Mar;9(3):481-4. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.3.481.
6
An evaluation of the carbon dioxide component in the GasPak anaerobic system.对GasPak厌氧系统中二氧化碳成分的评估。
J Appl Bacteriol. 1975 Oct;39(2):167-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1975.tb00558.x.
7
Treatment of anaerobic infections with metronidazole.甲硝唑治疗厌氧菌感染
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 May;7(5):672-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.7.5.672.
8
In vitro susceptibility studies with josamycin and erythromycin.交沙霉素和红霉素的体外药敏研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1976 Mar;9(3):546-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.9.3.546.