Tocher T M, Larson E B
Department of Internal Medicine, University of Washington Seattle, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 1999 May;14(5):303-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00338.x.
To determine whether physicians at a general internal medicine clinic spend more time with non-English-speaking patients.
A time-motion study comparing physician time spent with non-English-speaking patients and time spent with English-speaking patients during 5 months of observation. We also tested physicians' perceptions of their time use with a questionnaire.
Primary care internal medicine clinic at a county hospital.
PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred sixty-six established clinic patients, of whom 57 were non-English speaking and 109 were English speaking, and 15 attending physicians and 8 third-year resident physicians.
Outcome measures included total patient time in clinic, wait for first nurse or physician contact, time in contact with the nurse or physician, physician time spent on the visit, and physician perceptions of time use with non-English-speaking patients. After adjustment for demographic and comorbidity variables, non-English-speaking and English-speaking patients did not differ on any time-motion variables, including physician time spent on the visit (26.0 vs 25.8 minutes). A significant number of clinic physicians believed that they spent more time during a visit with non-English-speaking patients (85.7%) and needed more time to address important issues during a visit (90. 4%), (both p <.01). Physicians did not perceive differences in the amount they accomplished during a visit with non-English-speaking patients.
There were no differences in the time these physicians spent providing care to non-English-speaking patients and English-speaking patients. An important limitation of this study is that we were unable to measure quality of care provided or patients' satisfaction with their care. Physicians may believe that they are spending more time with non-English-speaking patients because of the challenges of language and cultural barriers.
确定普通内科诊所的医生是否会花更多时间接待非英语患者。
一项时间动作研究,比较在5个月的观察期内医生与非英语患者相处的时间以及与英语患者相处的时间。我们还通过问卷调查测试了医生对自己时间使用情况的认知。
县医院的基层内科诊所。
患者/参与者:166名诊所常客,其中57名非英语患者,109名英语患者,以及15名主治医生和8名三年级住院医生。
结果指标包括患者在诊所的总时间、等待首次与护士或医生接触的时间、与护士或医生接触的时间、医生问诊时间以及医生对与非英语患者问诊时间的认知。在对人口统计学和合并症变量进行调整后,非英语患者和英语患者在任何时间动作变量上均无差异,包括医生问诊时间(26.0分钟对25.8分钟)。相当多的诊所医生认为他们在接待非英语患者时花费了更多时间(85.7%),并且在问诊期间需要更多时间来处理重要问题(90.4%),(两者p <.01)。医生并未察觉到在接待非英语患者时他们完成的工作量有差异。
这些医生在为非英语患者和英语患者提供护理时所花费的时间没有差异。本研究的一个重要局限性在于我们无法衡量所提供护理的质量或患者对其护理的满意度。由于语言和文化障碍带来的挑战,医生可能认为他们在接待非英语患者时花费了更多时间。