van Bergen P, Kunert W, Buess G F
Department of General Surgery, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany.
Surg Endosc. 2000 Jan;14(1):71-4. doi: 10.1007/s004649900015.
In 1995, when we first used a high-definition television (HDTV) video system during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Tuebingen, we were surprised by the excellence of the spatial impression achieved by an image with improved resolution. Although any improvement in vision systems entails a trade-off among cost, quality, and complexity, high-definition imaging may well become an essential part of 3-D video systems. The aim of this experimental study was to assess the impact of high definition on surgical task efficiency in minimally invasive surgery and to determine whether it is preferable to use a 3-D system or a 2-D system with perfect resolution and color--for instance, HDTV or the three-chip charge-coupled device (3CCD).
We compared a 3-D video system with the vision through a stereoscopic rectoscope for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). Because its stereoscopic direct vision is not restricted to either shutter technology or video resolution, TEM optics represents the state of the art. For objective comparison, inanimate phantom models with suturing tasks were set up. The setups allowed the approach of parallel instruments as in TEM operations or via a laparoscopic approach, with oblique instruments coming laterally. Both types of procedure were carried out by highly experienced laparoscopic surgeons as well as those inexperienced in endoscopic surgery. These volunteers worked under 3-D video vision and/or TEM vision. Altogether, the model tasks were performed by 54 different persons.
The evaluation did not show a significant (p > 0.05) difference in performance time in all models, but there was a clear trend showing the benefit of a higher resolution.
We found a tendency for both endoscopically inexperienced and experienced surgeons to benefit from the use of a system with improved resolution (direct vision) rather than a 3-D shutter video system.
1995年,我们在图宾根进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术时首次使用了高清电视(HDTV)视频系统,当时我们对分辨率提高后的图像所带来的卓越空间感印象深刻。尽管视觉系统的任何改进都需要在成本、质量和复杂性之间进行权衡,但高清成像很可能会成为三维视频系统的重要组成部分。本实验研究的目的是评估高清对微创手术中手术任务效率的影响,并确定使用具有完美分辨率和色彩的三维系统还是二维系统(例如HDTV或三片式电荷耦合器件(3CCD))更可取。
我们将三维视频系统与经肛门内镜显微手术(TEM)中通过立体直肠镜的视觉效果进行了比较。由于其立体直视不受快门技术或视频分辨率的限制,TEM光学代表了当前的技术水平。为了进行客观比较,我们设置了带有缝合任务的无生命模拟模型。这些设置允许以TEM手术中或通过腹腔镜手术的方式平行插入器械,稍后还会有从侧面插入的倾斜器械。这两种手术方式均由经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生以及内镜手术经验不足的医生进行。这些志愿者在三维视频视觉和/或TEM视觉下工作。总共,模型任务由54名不同的人员完成。
评估结果显示,在所有模型中,手术时间没有显著差异(p>0.05),但有明显趋势表明分辨率提高具有益处。
我们发现,无论是内镜手术经验不足还是经验丰富的外科医生,使用分辨率提高的系统(直视)而非三维快门视频系统都有获益的趋势。