Humphreys M S, Dennis S, Chalmers K A, Finnigan S
The ARC Key Centre for Human Factors and Applied Cognitive Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2000 Dec;7(4):593-603. doi: 10.3758/bf03212997.
Current theoretical thinking about dual processes in recognition relies heavily on the measurement operations embodied within the process dissociation procedure. We critically evaluate the ability of this procedure to support this theoretical enterprise. We show that there are alternative processes that would produce a rough invariance in familiarity (a key prediction of the dual-processing approach) and that the process dissociation procedure does not have the power to differentiate between these alternative possibilities. We also show that attempts to relate parameters estimated by the process dissociation procedure to subjective reports (remember-know judgments) cannot differentiate between alternative dual-processing models and that there are problems with some of the historical evidence and with obtaining converging evidence. Our conclusion is that more specific theories incorporating ideas about representation and process are required.
当前关于识别中双重加工的理论思考在很大程度上依赖于过程分离程序中所包含的测量操作。我们批判性地评估了该程序支持这一理论事业的能力。我们表明，存在其他过程会在熟悉度上产生大致不变性（双重加工方法的一个关键预测），并且过程分离程序没有能力区分这些替代可能性。我们还表明，试图将过程分离程序估计的参数与主观报告（记得-知道判断）联系起来，无法区分替代的双重加工模型，并且一些历史证据存在问题以及难以获得趋同证据。我们的结论是，需要更具体的理论，纳入关于表征和过程的观点。
