Swenson J M, Ferraro M J, Sahm D F, Charache P, Tenover F C
Antimicrobial Resistance Section, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia 30333.
J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Oct;30(10):2525-8. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.10.2525-2528.1992.
Since 1988, when the first vancomycin-resistant enterococcus was described, several descriptions of failures of disk diffusion breakpoints to detect low-level vancomycin resistance (MICs, 8 to 32 micrograms/ml) have been published. A four-laboratory collaborative study was undertaken to establish more accurate breakpoints for the disk test. Mueller-Hinton agar was used to perform dilution testing (in three laboratories) and disk diffusion testing (in all laboratories). Results were determined at 18, 24, and 48 h, and zones of inhibition were read using both transmitted and reflected light. One hundred organisms (35 Enterococcus faecalis, 55 E. faecium, and 10 E. gallinarum or E. casseliflavus isolates) were selected to represent vancomycin-susceptible and -resistant phenotypes. Interlaboratory agreement of agar dilution MICs was better at 24 h (91 to 94% within +/- 1 dilution) than at 18 h (76% within +/- 1 dilution). Therefore, 24-h agar dilution MIC results were used as the reference. For disk diffusion, it was critical to note the presence of a haze or colonies inside the zone when interpreting the test, since this correlated better with the results of the agar dilution test. The presence of a haze or inner colonies was best detected by reading the zones with transmitted light and incubating the plates for a full 24 h. When plotted against 24-h agar dilution MICs, breakpoints of </= 14 mm (resistant), 15 to 16 mm (intermediate), and >/= 17 mm (susceptible) resulted in 58 minor errors (14.5% of total values) and 5 very major errors (2.2% of resistant values or 1.3% of total values). No major errors were seen. Results of repeat testing using a common lot of Mueller-Hinton agar showed 52 minor errors (13.3%) and 4 major errors (4.2% of susceptible values of 1.0% pf total values) but no very major errors. It is recommended that any haze or colonies within the zone be taken into account when determining zones of inhibition and that an MIC test be performed for strains with intermediate zones if vancomycin is being considered for treatment.
自1988年首次报道耐万古霉素肠球菌以来,已有多篇文献描述了纸片扩散法断点在检测低水平万古霉素耐药性(MIC为8至32微克/毫升)时的失败情况。开展了一项四实验室协作研究,以确定纸片试验更准确的断点。使用穆勒-欣顿琼脂进行稀释试验(三个实验室)和纸片扩散试验(所有实验室)。在18、24和48小时测定结果,并使用透射光和反射光读取抑菌圈。选择100株菌(35株粪肠球菌、55株屎肠球菌和10株鹑鸡肠球菌或格氏肠球菌分离株)来代表万古霉素敏感和耐药表型。琼脂稀释法MIC的实验室间一致性在24小时时(±1稀释度内为91%至94%)优于18小时时(±1稀释度内为76%)。因此,将24小时琼脂稀释法MIC结果用作参考。对于纸片扩散法,在解释试验时注意抑菌圈内是否有薄雾或菌落很关键,因为这与琼脂稀释试验结果的相关性更好。通过用透射光读取抑菌圈并将平板孵育满24小时,能最好地检测到薄雾或内部菌落的存在。与24小时琼脂稀释法MIC作图时,≤14毫米(耐药)、15至16毫米(中介)和≥17毫米(敏感)的断点导致58个小误差(占总值的14.5%)和5个非常大的误差(占耐药值的2.2%或总值的1.3%)。未出现大误差。使用同一批次穆勒-欣顿琼脂进行重复试验的结果显示有52个小误差(13.3%)和4个大误差(占敏感值的4.2%或总值的1.0%),但没有非常大的误差。建议在确定抑菌圈时考虑抑菌圈内的任何薄雾或菌落,并且如果考虑用万古霉素治疗,对抑菌圈为中介的菌株进行MIC试验。