Hegstad Kristin, Giske Christian G, Haldorsen Bjørg, Matuschek Erika, Schønning Kristian, Leegaard Truls M, Kahlmeter Gunnar, Sundsfjord Arnfinn
Reference Centre for Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance, Department of Microbiology and Infection Control, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 May;52(5):1582-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03544-13. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
Different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect low-level vancomycin resistance in enterococci were evaluated in a Scandinavian multicenter study (n=28). A phenotypically and genotypically well-characterized diverse collection of Enterococcus faecalis (n=12) and Enterococcus faecium (n=18) strains with and without nonsusceptibility to vancomycin was examined blindly in Danish (n=5), Norwegian (n=13), and Swedish (n=10) laboratories using the EUCAST disk diffusion method (n=28) and the CLSI agar screen (n=18) or the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux) (n=5). The EUCAST disk diffusion method (very major error [VME] rate, 7.0%; sensitivity, 0.93; major error [ME] rate, 2.4%; specificity, 0.98) and CLSI agar screen (VME rate, 6.6%; sensitivity, 0.93; ME rate, 5.6%; specificity, 0.94) performed significantly better (P=0.02) than the Vitek 2 system (VME rate, 13%; sensitivity, 0.87; ME rate, 0%; specificity, 1). The performance of the EUCAST disk diffusion method was challenged by differences in vancomycin inhibition zone sizes as well as the experience of the personnel in interpreting fuzzy zone edges as an indication of vancomycin resistance. Laboratories using Oxoid agar (P<0.0001) or Merck Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar (P=0.027) for the disk diffusion assay performed significantly better than did laboratories using BBL MH II medium. Laboratories using Difco brain heart infusion (BHI) agar for the CLSI agar screen performed significantly better (P=0.017) than did those using Oxoid BHI agar. In conclusion, both the EUCAST disk diffusion and CLSI agar screening methods performed acceptably (sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.94 to 0.98) in the detection of VanB-type vancomycin-resistant enterococci with low-level resistance. Importantly, use of the CLSI agar screen requires careful monitoring of the vancomycin concentration in the plates. Moreover, disk diffusion methodology requires that personnel be trained in interpreting zone edges.
在一项斯堪的纳维亚多中心研究(n = 28)中,对检测肠球菌中低水平万古霉素耐药性的不同抗菌药物敏感性试验方法进行了评估。在丹麦(n = 5)、挪威(n = 13)和瑞典(n = 10)的实验室中,使用欧盟CAST纸片扩散法(n = 28)以及CLSI琼脂筛选法(n = 18)或Vitek 2系统(生物梅里埃公司)(n = 5),对一组表型和基因型特征明确的粪肠球菌(n = 12)和屎肠球菌(n = 18)菌株进行了盲法检测,这些菌株对万古霉素有或无耐药性。欧盟CAST纸片扩散法(极重大错误[VME]率为7.0%;敏感性为0.93;重大错误[ME]率为2.4%;特异性为0.98)和CLSI琼脂筛选法(VME率为6.6%;敏感性为0.93;ME率为5.6%;特异性为0.94)的表现显著优于Vitek 2系统(VME率为13%;敏感性为0.87;ME率为0%;特异性为1)(P = 0.02)。欧盟CAST纸片扩散法的性能受到万古霉素抑菌圈大小差异以及人员解读模糊抑菌圈边缘作为万古霉素耐药性指标经验的挑战。使用Oxoid琼脂(P < 0.0001)或默克穆勒-欣顿(MH)琼脂(P = 0.027)进行纸片扩散试验的实验室表现显著优于使用BBL MH II培养基的实验室。使用Difco脑心浸液(BHI)琼脂进行CLSI琼脂筛选的实验室表现显著优于使用Oxoid BHI琼脂的实验室(P = 0.017)。总之,在检测具有低水平耐药性的VanB型万古霉素耐药肠球菌方面,欧盟CAST纸片扩散法和CLSI琼脂筛选法的表现均可接受(敏感性为0.93;特异性为0.94至0.98)。重要的是,使用CLSI琼脂筛选法需要仔细监测平板中万古霉素的浓度。此外,纸片扩散方法要求人员接受解读抑菌圈边缘的培训。