Carnegie Research Institute, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom.
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Oct;23(7):1960-7. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b8666e.
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the postactivation potentiation (PAP) effects of both dynamic and isometric maximum voluntary contractions (MVCs) on sprint and jump performance and establish whether PAP methods could be used effectively in warm up protocols for soccer players. Twelve male soccer players performed 4 warm up protocols in a cross-over, randomized, and counterbalanced design. In addition to a control warm up, subjects performed deadlift (5 repetitions at 5 repetitions maximum), tuck jump (5 repetitions), and isometric MVC knee extensions (3 repetitions for 3 s) as PAP treatments in an otherwise identical warm up protocol. After each treatment, the subjects underwent 3 10 m and 20 m sprints 4, 5, and 6 minutes post-warm up and 3 vertical jumps (VJ) at 7, 8, and 9 minutes post-warm up. Repeated measures analysis of variance showed no significant differences in the first 10 m (p = 0.258) and 20 m (p = 0.253) sprint and VJ (p = 0.703) performance and the average 10 m (p = 0.215), 20 m (p = 0.388), and VJ (p = 0.529) performance between conditions. There were also no significant differences in performance responses between the strongest and weakest subjects, but large variations in individual responses were found between the subjects. The findings suggest that there was no significant group PAP effect on sprint and jump performance after dynamic and isometric MVCs compared with a control warm up protocol. However, the large variation in individual responses (-7.1% to +8.2%) suggests PAP should be considered on an individual basis. Factors such as method, volume, load, recovery, and interindividual variability of PAP must be considered in the practical application of PAP and the rigorous research design of future studies to evaluate the potential for performance enhancement.
本研究旨在评估动态和等长最大自主收缩(MVC)的后激活增强(PAP)效应对短跑和跳跃表现的影响,并确定PAP 方法是否可有效用于足球运动员的热身方案。12 名男性足球运动员以交叉、随机和平衡的设计进行了 4 种热身方案的测试。除了控制热身外,受试者还在其他完全相同的热身方案中进行了硬拉(5 次重复,最大重复 5 次)、下蹲跳(5 次重复)和等长 MVC 膝关节伸展(3 次重复,每次 3 秒)作为 PAP 处理。在每次处理后,受试者在热身后 4、5 和 6 分钟进行 3 次 10 米和 20 米短跑,在热身后 7、8 和 9 分钟进行 3 次垂直跳跃(VJ)。重复测量方差分析显示,前 10 米(p = 0.258)和 20 米(p = 0.253)短跑和 VJ(p = 0.703)表现以及平均 10 米(p = 0.215)、20 米(p = 0.388)和 VJ(p = 0.529)表现在条件之间均无显著差异。在最强和最弱受试者之间,也没有发现表现响应的显著差异,但在受试者之间发现了个体响应的较大差异。研究结果表明,与对照热身方案相比,动态和等长 MVC 后,短跑和跳跃表现没有明显的组 PAP 效应。然而,个体反应的差异很大(-7.1%至+8.2%),这表明 PAP 应根据个体情况进行考虑。在 PAP 的实际应用和未来研究的严格研究设计中,必须考虑方法、量、负荷、恢复和 PAP 的个体间变异性等因素,以评估增强表现的潜力。