• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康教练、家庭血压监测和家庭滴定在控制低收入患者高血压中的效果:一项随机对照试验方案。

The effectiveness of health coaching, home blood pressure monitoring, and home-titration in controlling hypertension among low-income patients: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), 1001 Potrero Ave, Building 80/83, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 10;9:456. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-456.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-9-456
PMID:20003300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2797520/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the many antihypertensive medications available, two-thirds of patients with hypertension do not achieve blood pressure control. This is thought to be due to a combination of poor patient education, poor medication adherence, and "clinical inertia." The present trial evaluates an intervention consisting of health coaching, home blood pressure monitoring, and home medication titration as a method to address these three causes of poor hypertension control.

METHODS/DESIGN: The randomized controlled trial will include 300 patients with poorly controlled hypertension. Participants will be recruited from a primary care clinic in a teaching hospital that primarily serves low-income populations.An intervention group of 150 participants will receive health coaching, home blood pressure monitoring, and home-titration of antihypertensive medications during 6 months. The control group (n=150) will receive health coaching plus home blood pressure monitoring for the same duration. A passive control group will receive usual care. Blood pressure measurements will take place at baseline, and after 6 and 12 months. The primary outcome will be change in systolic blood pressure after 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes measured will be change in diastolic blood pressure, adverse events, and patient and provider satisfaction.

DISCUSSION

The present study is designed to assess whether the 3-pronged approach of health coaching, home blood pressure monitoring, and home medication titration can successfully improve blood pressure, and if so, whether this effect persists beyond the period of the intervention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01013857.

摘要

背景

尽管有许多降压药物可供选择,但仍有三分之二的高血压患者无法控制血压。这被认为是由于患者教育不佳、药物依从性差和“临床惰性”的综合作用。本试验评估了一种干预措施,该措施由健康指导、家庭血压监测和家庭药物滴定组成,旨在解决这三个导致高血压控制不佳的原因。

方法/设计:这项随机对照试验将纳入 300 名血压控制不佳的患者。参与者将从一家教学医院的初级保健诊所招募,该诊所主要服务于低收入人群。150 名干预组参与者将接受健康指导、家庭血压监测和家庭降压药物滴定,为期 6 个月。对照组(n=150)将在相同的时间内接受健康指导和家庭血压监测。一个被动对照组将接受常规护理。在基线、6 个月和 12 个月时进行血压测量。主要结局指标是 6 个月和 12 个月后收缩压的变化。测量的次要结局指标是舒张压的变化、不良事件和患者及提供者的满意度。

讨论

本研究旨在评估健康指导、家庭血压监测和家庭药物滴定的三管齐下方法是否能成功改善血压,如果是,这种效果是否能持续到干预期之外。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01013857。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710b/2797520/6e0edd86231f/1471-2458-9-456-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710b/2797520/6e0edd86231f/1471-2458-9-456-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/710b/2797520/6e0edd86231f/1471-2458-9-456-1.jpg

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of health coaching, home blood pressure monitoring, and home-titration in controlling hypertension among low-income patients: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.健康教练、家庭血压监测和家庭滴定在控制低收入患者高血压中的效果:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 10;9:456. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-456.
2
Health coaching to improve hypertension treatment in a low-income, minority population.健康教练在改善低收入、少数族裔人群高血压治疗中的作用。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 May-Jun;10(3):199-205. doi: 10.1370/afm.1369.
3
Long-Term Effect of Home Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring Plus Medication Self-Titration for Patients With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the ADAMPA Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭血压自我监测加药物自我滴定对高血压患者的长期影响:ADAMPA 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2410063. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10063.
4
Home and Online Management and Evaluation of Blood Pressure (HOME BP) digital intervention for self-management of uncontrolled, essential hypertension: a protocol for the randomised controlled HOME BP trial.家庭与在线血压管理及评估(HOME BP)数字干预用于未控制的原发性高血压自我管理:一项随机对照HOME BP试验方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 7;6(11):e012684. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012684.
5
Effect of a Community Health Worker-Led Multicomponent Intervention on Blood Pressure Control in Low-Income Patients in Argentina: A Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者主导的多组分干预对阿根廷低收入患者血压控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2017 Sep 19;318(11):1016-1025. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11358.
6
Effect of Home Blood Pressure Monitoring via a Smartphone Hypertension Coaching Application or Tracking Application on Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Randomized Clinical Trial.智能手机高血压管理应用程序中的家庭血压监测或跟踪应用程序对血压控制不佳的成年人的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200255. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0255.
7
A coordinated PCP-Cardiologist Telemedicine Model (PCTM) in China's community hypertension care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.中国社区高血压护理中的协调式初级保健医生-心脏病专家远程医疗模式(PCTM):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 May 25;18(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1970-z.
8
Rationale and design of a pragmatic clinical trial to assess the impact of self-monitoring blood pressure at home and self-titration of antihypertensive medication in poorly controlled hypertension: the ADAMPA study protocol.一项实用临床试验的原理与设计,旨在评估家庭自测血压及高血压控制不佳时抗高血压药物自我滴定的影响:ADAMPA研究方案
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 24;19(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0846-y.
9
The Take Control of Your Blood pressure (TCYB) study: study design and methodology.控制你的血压(TCYB)研究:研究设计与方法
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Jan;28(1):33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.08.006. Epub 2006 Aug 16.
10
Design of a randomized controlled trial comparing a mobile phone-based hypertension health coaching application to home blood pressure monitoring alone: The Smart Hypertension Control Study.一项比较基于手机的高血压健康指导应用与单纯家庭血压监测的随机对照试验设计:Smart Hypertension Control 研究。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Oct;73:92-97. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.08.013. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Inclusion of People with Disabilities in Research to Improve Medication Adherence: A Systematic Review.将残疾人纳入研究以改善药物依从性:一项系统评价。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 Jul 26;15:1671-1677. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S314135. eCollection 2021.
2
Efficacy of a Culturally and Linguistically Competent Community Health Coach Intervention for Chinese with Hypertension.针对患有高血压的华人的具有文化和语言能力的社区健康教练干预措施的效果
Asian Pac Isl Nurs J. 2020;5(3):111-119. doi: 10.31372/20200503.1087.
3
Improvement of nutritional intake for the low-income urban dwellers with hypertension in Malaysia.

本文引用的文献

1
Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: an exploration and status report.初级保健中行为改变的目标设定:探索和现状报告。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
2
Barriers to and determinants of medication adherence in hypertension management: perspective of the cohort study of medication adherence among older adults.高血压管理中药物依从性的障碍与决定因素:老年人药物依从性队列研究的视角
Med Clin North Am. 2009 May;93(3):753-69. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2009.02.007.
3
Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures.
改善马来西亚城市低收入高血压患者的营养摄入情况。
SAGE Open Med. 2020 Sep 20;8:2050312120960563. doi: 10.1177/2050312120960563. eCollection 2020.
4
African American women's perceptions of the meaning of support groups for improving adherence to hypertension treatment: a conceptual model.非裔美国女性对支持小组在提高高血压治疗依从性方面意义的认知:一个概念模型
Nurs Open. 2019 Apr 1;6(3):860-870. doi: 10.1002/nop2.266. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
Implementing a Health Coaching Curriculum in Hawaii's Community Health Centers.在夏威夷社区健康中心实施健康指导课程。
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2019 Jun;78(6 Suppl 1):65-69.
6
Effect of Education for Hypertensive Patients with Correctly Performed Self-Blood Pressure Monitoring (SBPM).对正确进行自我血压监测(SBPM)的高血压患者进行教育的效果。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2019 Jun 27;7(3):75. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030075.
7
KDOQI US Commentary on the 2017 ACC/AHA Hypertension Guideline.KDIGO 美国关于 2017 ACC/AHA 高血压指南的评论。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Apr;73(4):437-458. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.007.
8
Effect of Home Medication Titration on Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.家庭用药滴定对高血压患者血压控制的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Med Care. 2019 Mar;57(3):230-236. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001064.
9
Clinical inertia in the pharmacological management of hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高血压药物治疗中的临床惰性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(25):e11121. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011121.
10
Roles and Functions of Community Health Workers in Primary Care.社区卫生工作者在初级保健中的角色和功能。
Ann Fam Med. 2018 May;16(3):240-245. doi: 10.1370/afm.2208.
强化治疗与风险因素控制:迈向更具临床相关性的质量指标。
Med Care. 2009 Apr;47(4):395-402. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0b013e31818d775c.
4
A 41-year-old African American man with poorly controlled hypertension: review of patient and physician factors related to hypertension treatment adherence.一名41岁的非裔美国男性,患有控制不佳的高血压:回顾与高血压治疗依从性相关的患者和医生因素。
JAMA. 2009 Mar 25;301(12):1260-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.358. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
5
Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial.家庭血压监测、网络通信和药剂师护理对高血压控制的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2008 Jun 25;299(24):2857-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.24.2857.
6
Actively engaging patients in treatment decision making and monitoring as a strategy to improve hypertension outcomes in diabetes mellitus.让患者积极参与治疗决策和监测,以此作为改善糖尿病患者高血压治疗效果的一种策略。
Circulation. 2008 Mar 18;117(11):1355-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.764514.
7
Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification.糖尿病患者为何未达到推荐的风险因素目标?是依从性差还是缺乏强化治疗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):588-94. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0554-8. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
8
Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication.改善糖尿病患者的高血压控制:协作性和主动性健康沟通的效果
Circulation. 2008 Mar 18;117(11):1361-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.724005. Epub 2008 Mar 3.
9
Racial differences in blood pressure control: potential explanatory factors.血压控制中的种族差异:潜在的解释因素。
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):692-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0547-7. Epub 2008 Feb 21.
10
Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review.高血压管理的质量改进策略:一项系统综述
Med Care. 2006 Jul;44(7):646-57. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220260.30768.32.