Devers Eye Institute, Portland, Oregon 97210, USA.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2011 Jan;151(1):175-182.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.043. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
To determine the change in vision-related quality-of-life scores after providing eyeglasses to American Indian/Alaska Natives with undercorrected refractive error.
Prospective, comparative (nonrandomized) interventional study.
We compared a group with undercorrected refractive error to a control group who did not need a change in eyeglasses. Undercorrected refractive error was defined as distance visual acuity 20/40 or worse in the better-seeing eye that could be improved by at least 2 lines in Snellen visual acuity. Intervention was the provision of new glasses to the undercorrected refractive error group members, based on results of manifest refraction. The main outcome measures were the differences in the 25-Item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25) scores from baseline (Time 1) to the time after providing eyeglasses (Time 2).
The NEI VFQ-25 median Composite score at Time 1 was significantly lower in those with undercorrected refractive error when compared to the control group (75 vs 92, P = .001). The median Composite score for the undercorrected refractive error group improved to 96 (P < .001) at Time 2 when compared to Time 1, while the control group remained stable at 93 (P = .417). The undercorrected refractive error group showed significantly greater improvement than the control group in 8 of 12 subscale scores and in the overall Composite score (all P values ≤ .05). A multivariate linear regression analysis, which controlled for differences in age, percent self-identified American Indian/Alaskan Native, and best-corrected visual acuity between the undercorrected refractive error and control group, showed eyeglasses to be significantly associated with improvement in NEI VFQ-25 composite score.
Visual impairment from undercorrected refractive error is common in American Indian/Alaskan Natives. Providing eyeglasses results in a large, significant increase in vision-related quality of life.
确定为矫正不足的屈光不正的美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民提供眼镜后,与视力相关的生活质量评分的变化。
前瞻性、比较(非随机)干预研究。
我们将一组矫正不足的屈光不正者与不需要更换眼镜的对照组进行比较。矫正不足的屈光不正定义为在视力较好的眼睛中,远距视力低于 20/40 或更差,但在 Snellen 视力表中至少能提高 2 行。干预措施是根据明显的折射结果,为矫正不足的屈光不正组提供新眼镜。主要观察指标是从基线(第 1 时间)到提供眼镜后(第 2 时间)的 25 项国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(NEI VFQ-25)评分的差异。
与对照组相比,矫正不足的屈光不正者的 NEI VFQ-25 综合评分在第 1 时间明显较低(75 对 92,P =.001)。与第 1 时间相比,矫正不足的屈光不正组的中位数综合评分在第 2 时间提高到 96(P <.001),而对照组则稳定在 93(P =.417)。在 12 个子量表评分中的 8 项和整体综合评分中,矫正不足的屈光不正组的改善明显优于对照组(所有 P 值均≤.05)。多元线性回归分析控制了矫正不足的屈光不正组和对照组之间年龄、自我认同的美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民比例和最佳矫正视力的差异,显示眼镜与 NEI VFQ-25 综合评分的显著改善相关。
矫正不足的屈光不正导致的视力损害在美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民中很常见。提供眼镜可显著提高与视力相关的生活质量。