The University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812-1825, USA.
J Athl Train. 2010 Nov-Dec;45(6):594-600. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-45.6.594.
Telemetric core-temperature monitoring is becoming more widely used as a noninvasive means of monitoring core temperature during athletic events.
To determine the effects of sensor ingestion timing on serial measures of core temperature during continuous exercise.
Crossover study.
Outdoor dirt track at an average ambient temperature of 4.4°C ± 4.1°C and relative humidity of 74.1% ± 11.0%.
Seven healthy, active participants (3 men, 4 women; age = 27.0 ± 7.5 years, height = 172.9 ± 6.8 cm, body mass = 67.5 ± 6.1 kg, percentage body fat = 12.7% ± 6.9%, peak oxygen uptake [Vo(2peak)] = 54.4 ± 6.9 mL•kg⁻¹•min⁻¹) completed the study.
INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed a 45-minute exercise trial at approximately 70% Vo(2peak). They consumed core-temperature sensors at 24 hours (P1) and 40 minutes (P2) before exercise.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Core temperature was recorded continuously (1-minute intervals) using a wireless data logger worn by the participants. All data were analyzed using a 2-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (trial × time), Pearson product moment correlation, and Bland-Altman plot.
Fifteen comparisons were made between P1 and P2. The main effect of time indicated an increase in core temperature compared with the initial temperature. However, we did not find a main effect for trial or a trial × time interaction, indicating no differences in core temperature between the sensors (P1 = 38.3°C ± 0.2°C, P2 = 38.3°C ± 0.4°C).
We found no differences in the temperature recordings between the 2 sensors. These results suggest that assumed sensor location (upper or lower gastrointestinal tract) does not appreciably alter the transmission of reliable and repeatable measures of core temperature during continuous running in the cold.
遥测核心温度监测作为一种在运动过程中监测核心温度的非侵入性手段,应用越来越广泛。
确定在连续运动过程中,传感器摄入时间对核心温度连续测量的影响。
交叉研究。
室外土赛道,平均环境温度为 4.4°C±4.1°C,相对湿度为 74.1%±11.0%。
7 名健康、活跃的参与者(3 名男性,4 名女性;年龄 27.0±7.5 岁,身高 172.9±6.8cm,体重 67.5±6.1kg,体脂百分比 12.7%±6.9%,峰值摄氧量[Vo(2peak)]54.4±6.9mL•kg⁻¹•min⁻¹)完成了研究。
参与者进行了约 70%Vo(2peak)的 45 分钟运动试验。他们在运动前 24 小时(P1)和 40 分钟(P2)摄入核心温度传感器。
参与者佩戴的无线数据记录仪连续记录核心温度(1 分钟间隔)。所有数据均采用 2 因素重复测量方差分析(试验×时间)、皮尔逊积矩相关和 Bland-Altman 图进行分析。
在 P1 和 P2 之间进行了 15 次比较。时间的主要效应表明核心温度与初始温度相比有所升高。然而,我们没有发现试验或试验×时间交互的主要效应,这表明两个传感器之间的核心温度没有差异(P1=38.3°C±0.2°C,P2=38.3°C±0.4°C)。
我们发现两个传感器的温度记录没有差异。这些结果表明,在寒冷条件下连续跑步时,假定的传感器位置(上或下胃肠道)不会明显改变核心温度的可靠和可重复测量的传输。