Centre for Human and Applied Physiology, School of Health Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Oct;112(10):3597-606. doi: 10.1007/s00421-012-2340-x. Epub 2012 Feb 12.
Individuals exposed to extreme heat may experience reduced physiological and cognitive performance, even during very light work. This can have disastrous effects on the operational capability of aircrew, but such impairment could be prevented by auxiliary cooling devices. This hypothesis was tested under very hot-dry conditions, in which eight males performed 2 h of low-intensity exercise (~30 W) in three trials, whilst wearing biological and chemical protective clothing: temperate (control: 20°C, 30% relative humidity) and two hot-dry trials (48°C, 20% relative humidity), one without (experimental) and one with liquid cooling (water at 15°C). Physiological strain and six cognitive functions were evaluated (MiniCog Rapid Assessment Battery), and participants drank to sustain hydration state. Maximal core temperatures averaged 37.0°C (±0.1) in the control trial, and were significantly elevated in the experimental trial (38.9°C ± 0.3; P < 0.05). Similarly, heart rates peaked at 92 beats min(-1) (±7) and 133 beats min(-1) (±4; P < 0.05), respectively. Liquid cooling reduced maximal core temperatures (37.3°C ± 0.1; P < 0.05) and heart rates 87 beats min(-1) (±3; P < 0.05) in the heat, such that neither now differed significantly from the control trial (P > 0.05). However, despite inducing profound hyperthermia and volitional fatigue, no cognitive degradation was evident in the heat (P > 0.05). Since extensive dehydration was prevented, it appears that thermal strain in the absence of dehydration may have minimal impact upon cognitive function, at least as evaluated within this experiment.
个体暴露在极端高温下可能会出现生理和认知表现下降的情况,即使是在进行非常轻松的工作时也是如此。这可能会对机组人员的操作能力造成灾难性的影响,但通过辅助冷却设备可以预防这种损伤。本研究在非常炎热干燥的条件下进行,八名男性在三种试验中穿着生物和化学防护服进行了 2 小时的低强度运动(~30 W):温和条件(对照:20°C,30%相对湿度)和两种炎热干燥条件(48°C,20%相对湿度),一种无辅助冷却(实验)和一种液体冷却(15°C 的水)。评估了生理应激和六项认知功能(MiniCog 快速评估电池),参与者通过饮水来维持水合状态。在对照试验中,平均最大核心温度为 37.0°C(±0.1),在实验试验中显著升高(38.9°C ± 0.3;P < 0.05)。同样,心率峰值分别为 92 次/分钟(±7)和 133 次/分钟(±4;P < 0.05)。在热环境中,液体冷却可降低最大核心温度(37.3°C ± 0.1;P < 0.05)和心率 87 次/分钟(±3;P < 0.05),以至于两者在热环境中与对照试验相比均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。然而,尽管引起了明显的体温过高和自愿性疲劳,但在热环境中没有明显的认知能力下降(P > 0.05)。由于防止了严重脱水,因此似乎在没有脱水的情况下,热应激对认知功能的影响可能很小,至少在本实验中是这样评估的。