Wasserman Melanie, Renfrew Megan R, Green Alexander R, Lopez Lenny, Tan-McGrory Aswita, Brach Cindy, Betancourt Joseph R
J Healthc Qual. 2014 May-Jun;36(3):5-16. doi: 10.1111/jhq.12065. Epub 2014 Mar 16.
Since the 1999 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report To Err is Human, progress has been made in patient safety, but few efforts have focused on safety in patients with limited English proficiency (LEP). This article describes the development, content, and testing of two new evidence-based Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) tools for LEP patient safety. In the content development phase, a comprehensive mixed-methods approach was used to identify common causes of errors for LEP patients, high-risk scenarios, and evidence-based strategies to address them. Based on our findings, Improving Patient Safety Systems for Limited English Proficient Patients: A Guide for Hospitals contains recommendations to improve detection and prevention of medical errors across diverse populations, and TeamSTEPPS Enhancing Safety for Patients with Limited English Proficiency Module trains staff to improve safety through team communication and incorporating interpreters in the care process. The Hospital Guide was validated with leaders in quality and safety at diverse hospitals, and the TeamSTEPPS LEP module was field-tested in varied settings within three hospitals. Both tools were found to be implementable, acceptable to their audiences, and conducive to learning. Further research on the impact of the combined use of the guide and module would shed light on their value as a multifaceted intervention.
自1999年医学研究所(IOM)发布《人皆会犯错》报告以来,患者安全方面已取得进展,但针对英语水平有限(LEP)患者的安全却鲜有举措。本文介绍了医疗保健研究与质量局(AHRQ)为LEP患者安全开发的两种新的循证工具的开发过程、内容及测试情况。在内容开发阶段,采用了综合的混合方法来确定LEP患者错误的常见原因、高风险场景以及基于证据的应对策略。根据我们的研究结果,《提高英语水平有限患者的患者安全系统:医院指南》包含了关于改善不同人群医疗差错检测与预防的建议,而“团队策略与工具提升患者安全:英语水平有限患者模块”(TeamSTEPPS Enhancing Safety for Patients with Limited English Proficiency Module)则培训工作人员通过团队沟通并在护理过程中引入口译员来提高安全性。《医院指南》在不同医院的质量与安全负责人那里得到了验证,“团队策略与工具提升患者安全:英语水平有限患者模块”在三家医院的不同环境中进行了实地测试。结果发现这两种工具均可实施,受众能够接受,并且有助于学习。对指南和模块联合使用的影响进行进一步研究将有助于了解它们作为多方面干预措施的价值。