Takov Kaloyan, Yellon Derek M, Davidson Sean M
The Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, UK.
J Extracell Vesicles. 2018 Dec 28;8(1):1560809. doi: 10.1080/20013078.2018.1560809. eCollection 2019.
Interest in small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) as functional carriers of proteins and nucleic acids is growing continuously. There are large numbers of sEVs in the blood, but lack of standardised methods for sEV isolation greatly limits our ability to study them. In this report, we use rat plasma to systematically compare two commonly used techniques for isolation of sEVs: ultracentrifugation (UC-sEVs) and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC-sEVs). SEC-sEVs had higher particle number, protein content, particle/protein ratios and sEV marker signal than UC-sEVs. However, SEC-sEVs also contained greater amounts of APOB lipoproteins and large quantities of non-sEV protein. sEV marker signal correlated very well with both particle number and protein content in UC-sEVs but not in all of the SEC-sEV fractions. Functionally, both UC-sEVs and SEC-sEVs isolates contained a variety of proangiogenic factors (with endothelin-1 being the most abundant) and stimulated migration of endothelial cells. However, there was no evident correlation between the promigratory potential and the quantity of sEVs added, indicating that non-vesicular co-isolates may contribute to the promigratory effects. Overall, our findings suggest that UC provides plasma sEVs of lower yields, but markedly higher purity compared to SEC. Furthermore, we show that the functional activity of sEVs can depend on the isolation method used and does not solely reflect the sEV quantity. These findings are of importance when working with sEVs isolated from plasma- or serum-containing conditioned medium.
作为蛋白质和核酸的功能性载体,人们对小细胞外囊泡(sEVs)的兴趣持续增长。血液中存在大量的sEVs,但缺乏标准化的sEV分离方法极大地限制了我们对其进行研究的能力。在本报告中,我们使用大鼠血浆系统地比较了两种常用的sEV分离技术:超速离心法(UC-sEVs)和尺寸排阻色谱法(SEC-sEVs)。与UC-sEVs相比,SEC-sEVs具有更高的颗粒数、蛋白质含量、颗粒/蛋白质比率和sEV标记信号。然而,SEC-sEVs还含有更多的载脂蛋白B和大量的非sEV蛋白质。sEV标记信号与UC-sEVs中的颗粒数和蛋白质含量均具有很好的相关性,但并非与所有SEC-sEV组分都具有相关性。在功能上,UC-sEVs和SEC-sEVs分离物均含有多种促血管生成因子(内皮素-1含量最高),并能刺激内皮细胞迁移。然而,促迁移潜力与添加的sEVs数量之间没有明显的相关性,这表明非囊泡共分离物可能对促迁移作用有贡献。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,与SEC相比,UC获得的血浆sEVs产量较低,但纯度明显更高。此外,我们表明sEVs的功能活性可能取决于所使用的分离方法,并不完全反映sEV的数量。这些发现对于处理从含血浆或血清的条件培养基中分离出的sEVs时具有重要意义。