• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高德国移民接受健康访谈调查可及性的干预措施:混合模式可行性研究

Interventions to Increase the Reachability of Migrants in Germany With Health Interview Surveys: Mixed-Mode Feasibility Study.

作者信息

Zeisler Marie-Luise, Bilgic Leman, Schumann Maria, Wengler Annelene, Lemcke Johannes, Gößwald Antje, Lampert Thomas, Santos-Hövener Claudia, Schmich Patrick

机构信息

Unit 21: Epidemiological Data Centre, Department 2: Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, 12101 Berlin, Germany.

Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

JMIR Form Res. 2020 Apr 15;4(4):e14747. doi: 10.2196/14747.

DOI:10.2196/14747
PMID:32293576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7191348/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Germany is a popular destination for immigrants, and migration has increased in recent years. It is therefore important to collect reliable data on migrants' health. The Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany, has launched the Improving Health Monitoring in Migrant Populations (IMIRA) project to sustainably integrate migrant populations into health monitoring in Germany.

OBJECTIVE

One of IMIRA's objectives is to implement a feasibility study (the IMIRA survey) that focuses on testing various interventions to increase the reachability of migrants with health interview surveys. Possible causes of nonresponse should be identified so as to increase participation in future surveys.

METHODS

The survey target populations were Turkish, Polish, Romanian, Syrian, and Croatian migrants, who represent the biggest migrant groups living in Germany. We used probability sampling, using data from the registration offices in 2 states (Berlin and Brandenburg); we randomly selected 9068 persons by nationality in 7 sample points. We applied age (3 categories: 18-44, 45-64, and ≥65 years) and sex strata. Modes and methods used to test their usability were culturally sensitive materials, online questionnaires, telephone interviews, personal contact, and personal interviews, using multilingual materials and interviewers. To evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions, we used an intervention group (group A) and a control group (group B). There were also focus groups with the interviewers to get more information about the participants' motivation. We used the European Health Interview Survey, with additional instruments on religious affiliation, experience of discrimination, and subjective social status. We evaluated results according to their final contact result (disposition code).

RESULTS

We collected data from January to May 2018 in Berlin and Brandenburg, Germany. The survey had an overall response rate of 15.88% (1190/7494). However, final disposition codes varied greatly with regard to citizenship. In addition to the quantitative results, interviewers reported in the focus groups a "feeling of connectedness" to the participants due to the multilingual interventions. The interviewers were particularly positive about the home visits, because "if you are standing at the front door, you will be let in for sure."

CONCLUSIONS

The IMIRA survey appraised the usability of mixed-mode or mixed-method approaches among migrant groups with a probability sample in 2 German states. When conducting the survey, we were confronted with issues regarding the translation of the questionnaire, as well as the validity of some instruments in the survey languages. A major result was that personal face-to-face contact was the most effective intervention to recruit our participants. We will implement the findings in the upcoming health monitoring study at the Robert Koch Institute.

摘要

背景

德国是一个受欢迎的移民目的地,近年来移民数量有所增加。因此,收集有关移民健康的可靠数据非常重要。德国柏林的罗伯特·科赫研究所发起了“改善移民人口健康监测”(IMIRA)项目,以将移民人口可持续地纳入德国的健康监测。

目的

IMIRA的目标之一是开展一项可行性研究(IMIRA调查),重点测试各种干预措施,以提高通过健康访谈调查接触移民的可能性。应确定无回应的可能原因,以提高未来调查的参与度。

方法

调查目标人群为土耳其、波兰、罗马尼亚、叙利亚和克罗地亚移民,他们是居住在德国的最大移民群体。我们采用概率抽样,使用来自两个州(柏林和勃兰登堡)登记处的数据;我们在7个采样点按国籍随机选择了9068人。我们应用了年龄(3个类别:18 - 44岁、45 - 64岁和≥65岁)和性别分层。用于测试其可用性的方式和方法包括文化敏感材料、在线问卷、电话访谈、个人联系和个人访谈,使用多语言材料和访谈员。为评估干预措施的有效性,我们设立了一个干预组(A组)和一个对照组(B组)。还与访谈员进行了焦点小组讨论,以获取更多关于参与者动机的信息。我们使用了欧洲健康访谈调查,并增加了关于宗教信仰、歧视经历和主观社会地位的工具。我们根据最终联系结果(处置代码)评估结果。

结果

我们于2018年1月至5月在德国柏林和勃兰登堡收集数据。该调查的总体回应率为15.88%(1190/7494)。然而,最终处置代码在公民身份方面差异很大。除了定量结果外,访谈员在焦点小组中报告称,由于采用了多语言干预措施,他们与参与者有一种“联系感”。访谈员对家访尤其满意,因为“如果你站在前门,肯定会被允许进入”。

结论

IMIRA调查评估了在德国两个州采用概率抽样的混合模式或混合方法在移民群体中的可用性。在进行调查时,我们面临问卷翻译以及调查语言中一些工具的有效性问题。一个主要结果是,个人面对面接触是招募我们参与者的最有效干预措施。我们将在罗伯特·科赫研究所即将开展的健康监测研究中应用这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19c1/7191348/67ad70b068a2/formative_v4i4e14747_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19c1/7191348/2c8ccf6ed23d/formative_v4i4e14747_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19c1/7191348/72338a1c6fc0/formative_v4i4e14747_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19c1/7191348/67ad70b068a2/formative_v4i4e14747_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19c1/7191348/2c8ccf6ed23d/formative_v4i4e14747_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19c1/7191348/72338a1c6fc0/formative_v4i4e14747_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19c1/7191348/67ad70b068a2/formative_v4i4e14747_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Interventions to Increase the Reachability of Migrants in Germany With Health Interview Surveys: Mixed-Mode Feasibility Study.提高德国移民接受健康访谈调查可及性的干预措施:混合模式可行性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2020 Apr 15;4(4):e14747. doi: 10.2196/14747.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
6
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.
9
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
10
Group-based interventions to reduce gambling involvement among male football fans: a synopsis of findings from a feasibility study.基于群体的干预措施以减少男性足球迷的赌博行为:一项可行性研究结果概述
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jul;13(6):1-24. doi: 10.3310/SWWP9393.

引用本文的文献

1
Normative values for the hypoparathyroidism patient questionnaire (HPQ28) in the German general population.德国普通人群中甲状旁腺功能减退患者问卷(HPQ28)的标准值。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025 Apr 3;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41687-025-00868-3.
2
Recruiting people with selected citizenships for the health interview survey GEDA Fokus throughout Germany: evaluation of recruitment efforts and recommendations for future research.在全德国范围内为健康访谈调查 GEDA Fokus 招募具有特定国籍的人员:对招募工作的评估和对未来研究的建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 12;24(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02328-w.
3
Exploring pre-pandemic patterns of vaccine decision-making with the 5C model: results from representative surveys in 2016 and 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the inclusion and participation of children and adolescents with a migration background in KiGGS Wave 2.在德国儿童青少年健康访谈与检查调查(KiGGS)第二轮中提高有移民背景的儿童和青少年的纳入率及参与度。
J Health Monit. 2018 Mar 15;3(1):126-142. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-034. eCollection 2018 Mar.
2
KiGGS Wave 2 cross-sectional study - participant acquisition, response rates and representativeness.德国儿童青少年健康监测与促进项目第二轮横断面研究——参与者招募、应答率及代表性
J Health Monit. 2018 Mar 15;3(1):78-91. doi: 10.17886/RKI-GBE-2018-032. eCollection 2018 Mar.
3
Participation of Turkish Migrants in an Epidemiological Study: Does the Recruitment Strategy Affect the Sample Characteristics?
利用 5C 模型探索大流行前的疫苗决策模式:来自 2016 年和 2018 年代表性调查的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 30;24(1):1205. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18674-9.
4
Medical Brain Drain From Southeastern Europe: Using Digital Demography to Forecast Health Worker Emigration.东南欧的医疗人才外流:利用数字人口统计学预测卫生工作者移民
JMIRx Med. 2021 Nov 30;2(4):e30831. doi: 10.2196/30831.
5
Migration and health: moving towards a diversity-oriented public health monitoring at the Robert Koch Institute.移民与健康:迈向罗伯特·科赫研究所以多样性为导向的公共卫生监测
J Health Monit. 2023 Mar 21;8(1):3-6. doi: 10.25646/11141. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Health of people with selected citizenships: results of the study GEDA Fokus.特定国籍人群的健康状况:德国成人精神疾病调查聚焦研究结果
J Health Monit. 2023 Mar 21;8(1):7-33. doi: 10.25646/11143. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Recommendations for collecting and analysing migration-related determinants in public health research.公共卫生研究中收集和分析与移民相关的决定因素的建议。
J Health Monit. 2023 Mar 21;8(1):52-72. doi: 10.25646/11144. eCollection 2023 Mar.
8
German Health Update Fokus (GEDA Fokus) among Residents with Croatian, Italian, Polish, Syrian, or Turkish Citizenship in Germany: Protocol for a Multilingual Mixed-Mode Interview Survey.德国克罗地亚、意大利、波兰、叙利亚或土耳其籍居民中的德国健康最新情况焦点(GEDA焦点):多语言混合模式访谈调查方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Apr 12;12:e43503. doi: 10.2196/43503.
9
Strategies for Recruiting Migrants to Participate in a Sexual Health Survey: Methods, Results, and Lessons.招募移民参与性健康调查的策略:方法、结果和经验教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 26;19(19):12213. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912213.
10
Investigating associated factors of primary and specialist health care utilization among people with selected nationalities: results of a multilingual survey in two German federal states.调查具有特定国籍人群在初级和专科保健方面的利用情况及其相关因素:两个德国联邦州多语种调查结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 17;22(1):1050. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08419-y.
土耳其移民参与流行病学研究:招募策略是否会影响样本特征?
J Immigr Minor Health. 2019 Aug;21(4):811-819. doi: 10.1007/s10903-018-0788-4.
4
Sampling immigrants in the Netherlands and Germany.对荷兰和德国的移民进行抽样调查。
Comp Migr Stud. 2017;5(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40878-017-0062-2. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
5
Implementation of the European health interview survey (EHIS) into the German health update (GEDA).将欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS)纳入德国健康更新调查(GEDA)。
Arch Public Health. 2017 Sep 18;75:40. doi: 10.1186/s13690-017-0208-6. eCollection 2017.
6
[Measuring subjective social status in health research with a German version of the MacArthur Scale].[使用德语版麦克阿瑟量表在健康研究中测量主观社会地位]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Jul;58(7):749-57. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2166-x.
7
[Participation of people with migration background in health surveys of the Robert Koch Institute].[具有移民背景的人群参与罗伯特·科赫研究所的健康调查情况]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Jun;58(6):533-42. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2146-1.
8
[The first KiGGS follow-up (KiGGS Wave 1): study conduct, sample design, and response].[德国儿童青少年健康监测的首次随访(KiGGS第一轮):研究实施、样本设计与应答情况]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2014 Jul;57(7):747-61. doi: 10.1007/s00103-014-1973-9.
9
Comparing sampling strategies to recruit migrants for an epidemiological study. Results from a German feasibility study.比较为一项流行病学研究招募移民的抽样策略。一项德国可行性研究的结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2014 Oct;24(5):721-6. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku046. Epub 2014 May 27.
10
Reaching the hard-to-reach: a systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups.难以接触的人群:改善健康和医学研究与社会弱势群体相关的策略的系统评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 25;14:42. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-42.