Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.
BlueDot, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 12;12(1):311. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20219-8.
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, predictions of international outbreaks were largely based on imported cases from Wuhan, China, potentially missing imports from other cities. We provide a method, combining daily COVID-19 prevalence and flight passenger volume, to estimate importations from 18 Chinese cities to 43 international destinations, including 26 in Africa. Global case importations from China in early January came primarily from Wuhan, but the inferred source shifted to other cities in mid-February, especially for importations to African destinations. We estimate that 10.4 (6.2 - 27.1) COVID-19 cases were imported to these African destinations, which exhibited marked variation in their magnitude and main sources of importation. We estimate that 90% of imported cases arrived between 17 January and 7 February, prior to the first case detections. Our results highlight the dynamic role of source locations, which can help focus surveillance and response efforts.
在 COVID-19 大流行早期,对国际疫情爆发的预测主要基于从中国武汉输入的病例,可能会忽略其他城市的输入病例。我们提供了一种方法,结合每日 COVID-19 流行率和航班客流量,来估算 18 个中国城市对 43 个国际目的地(包括 26 个非洲目的地)的输入病例。1 月初,从中国输入的全球病例主要来自武汉,但在 2 月中旬,推断的来源转向了其他城市,尤其是对非洲目的地的输入病例。我们估计有 10.4(6.2-27.1)例 COVID-19 病例输入到这些非洲目的地,这些目的地的输入病例数量和主要输入来源存在显著差异。我们估计 90%的输入病例是在 1 月 17 日至 2 月 7 日之间,也就是首次发现病例之前到达的。我们的研究结果突出了来源地的动态作用,这有助于集中监测和应对工作。