• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估公众对美国有关 COVID-19 公共信息来源信任的迅速下降。

An Assessment of the Rapid Decline of Trust in US Sources of Public Information about COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2020 Oct 2;25(10):764-773. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1865487.

DOI:10.1080/10810730.2020.1865487
PMID:33719879
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7968001/
Abstract

We conducted a longitidinal assessment of 806 respondents in March, 2020 in the US to examine the trustworthiness of sources of information about COVID-19. Respondents were recontacted after four months. Information sources included mainstream media, state health departments, the CDC, the White House, and a well-known university. We also examined how demographics, political partisanship, and skepticism about COVID-19 were associated with the perceived trustworthiness of information sources and decreased trustworthiness over time. At baseline, the majority of respondants reported high trust in COVID-19 information from state health departments (75.6%), the CDC (80.9%), and a university (Johns Hopkins, 81.1%). Mainstream media was trusted by less than half the respondents (41.2%), and the White House was the least trusted source (30.9%). At the 4-month follow-up, a significant decrease in trustworthiness in all five sources of COVID-19 information was observed. The most pronounced reductions were from the CDC and the White House. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with rating the CDC, state health department, and a university as trustworthy sources of COVID-19 information were political party affiliation, level of education, and skepticism about COVID-19. The most consistent predictor of decreased trust was political party affiliation, with Democrats as compared to Republicans less likely to report decreased trust across all sources.

摘要

我们在 2020 年 3 月对美国的 806 名受访者进行了一项纵向评估,以研究他们对 COVID-19 相关信息来源的信任程度。四个月后对受访者进行了重新联系。信息来源包括主流媒体、州卫生部门、CDC、白宫和一所知名大学。我们还研究了人口统计学特征、政治党派立场以及对 COVID-19 的怀疑态度如何与信息来源的感知可信度以及随着时间的推移可信度的下降相关。在基线时,大多数受访者报告对州卫生部门(75.6%)、CDC(80.9%)和一所大学(约翰霍普金斯大学,81.1%)的 COVID-19 信息高度信任。不到一半的受访者信任主流媒体(41.2%),而白宫是最不受信任的来源(30.9%)。在 4 个月的随访中,观察到对所有五种 COVID-19 信息来源的信任度显著下降。CDC 和白宫的降幅最大。在多变量分析中,与将 CDC、州卫生部门和大学评为 COVID-19 信息可信来源相关的因素包括党派、教育程度和对 COVID-19 的怀疑态度。最一致的降低信任度的预测因素是党派,与共和党相比,民主党在所有来源中报告信任度下降的可能性更小。

相似文献

1
An Assessment of the Rapid Decline of Trust in US Sources of Public Information about COVID-19.评估公众对美国有关 COVID-19 公共信息来源信任的迅速下降。
J Health Commun. 2020 Oct 2;25(10):764-773. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1865487.
2
Trust in COVID-19 information sources and perceived risk among smokers: A nationally representative survey.信任 COVID-19 信息源与吸烟者感知风险:一项全国代表性调查。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0262097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262097. eCollection 2022.
3
Effects of Age, Gender, Health Status, and Political Party on COVID-19-Related Concerns and Prevention Behaviors: Results of a Large, Longitudinal Cross-sectional Survey.年龄、性别、健康状况和政党对 COVID-19 相关问题和预防行为的影响:一项大型、纵向横断面调查的结果。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 28;7(4):e24277. doi: 10.2196/24277.
4
Trusted information sources in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic predict vaccination uptake over one year later.在 COVID-19 大流行的早期,可靠信息来源预测一年后疫苗接种率。
Vaccine. 2023 Jan 9;41(2):573-580. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.076. Epub 2022 Dec 6.
5
Trends and Predictors of COVID-19 Information Sources and Their Relationship With Knowledge and Beliefs Related to the Pandemic: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.COVID-19 信息来源的趋势和预测因素及其与大流行相关知识和信念的关系:全国性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 8;6(4):e21071. doi: 10.2196/21071.
6
Association Between Public Knowledge About COVID-19, Trust in Information Sources, and Adherence to Social Distancing: Cross-Sectional Survey.公众对 COVID-19 的了解、对信息源的信任与遵守社交距离措施之间的关联:横断面调查。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Sep 15;6(3):e22060. doi: 10.2196/22060.
7
Adherence to Social Distancing Guidelines Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Roles of Pseudoscientific Beliefs, Trust, Political Party Affiliation, and Risk Perceptions.在整个新冠疫情期间对社交距离指导方针的遵守情况:伪科学信念、信任、政党归属和风险认知的作用
Ann Behav Med. 2021 May 6;55(5):399-412. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab024.
8
Knowledge, Perceptions, and Preferred Information Sources Related to COVID-19 Among Central Pennsylvania Adults Early in the Pandemic: A Mixed Methods Cross-Sectional Survey.宾夕法尼亚州中部成年人在大流行早期对 COVID-19 的认知、看法和首选信息来源:一项混合方法的横断面调查。
Ann Fam Med. 2021 Jul-Aug;19(4):293-301. doi: 10.1370/afm.2674. Epub 2021 May 13.
9
Opposing views: associations of political polarization, political party affiliation, and social trust with COVID-19 vaccination intent and receipt.对立观点:政治两极化、政党归属和社会信任与 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿和接种情况的关联。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2023 Mar 14;45(1):36-39. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab401.
10
Use of the socio-ecological model to explore trusted sources of COVID-19 information in Black and Latinx communities in Michigan.利用社会生态模型探索密歇根州黑人和拉丁裔社区中可信赖的 COVID-19 信息来源。
J Commun Healthc. 2023 Dec;16(4):389-400. doi: 10.1080/17538068.2023.2277499. Epub 2023 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Shared disbelief and shared belief: Belief and disbelief as drivers of interpersonal neural synchronization during narrative processing.共同的怀疑与共同的信念:叙事加工过程中,信念与怀疑作为人际神经同步的驱动因素
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 10;122(23):e2422396122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2422396122. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Perspectives of Vietnamese Americans Regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Trusted Sources of Information, and Pandemic-related Challenges.美籍越南人对新冠疫苗接种、可靠信息来源及疫情相关挑战的看法
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Mar 8. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02327-7.
3
Cross-Cultural Sense-Making of Global Health Crises: A Text Mining Study of Public Opinions on Social Media Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic in Developed and Developing Economies.全球卫生危机的跨文化意义建构:关于发达经济体和发展中经济体社交媒体上与新冠疫情相关公众舆论的文本挖掘研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 27;27:e58656. doi: 10.2196/58656.
4
Online Misleading Information About Women's Reproductive Health: A Narrative Review.关于女性生殖健康的网络误导性信息:一项叙述性综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Apr;40(5):1123-1131. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09118-6. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
5
A leader I can(not) trust: understanding the path from epistemic trust to political leader choices via dogmatism.一个我无法信任的领导人:理解从认知信任经由教条主义到政治领导人选择的路径。
Politics Life Sci. 2025;44(1):88-107. doi: 10.1017/pls.2024.11. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
6
Examination of factors that impact mask or respirator purchase and usage during the COVID-19 pandemic.考察在 COVID-19 大流行期间影响口罩或呼吸器购买和使用的因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 25;19(9):e0308841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308841. eCollection 2024.
7
Disparities in COVID-19 vaccine intentions, testing and trusted sources by household language for children with medical complexity.儿童医疗复杂性患者按家庭语言划分的 COVID-19 疫苗接种意愿、检测和信任来源的差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 14;19(6):e0305553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305553. eCollection 2024.
8
Can the 19th-century speak to today's science communication challenges?19世纪能应对当今科学传播的挑战吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 4;121(23):e2409349121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2409349121. Epub 2024 May 29.
9
Autonomous and policy-induced behavior change during the COVID-19 pandemic: Towards understanding and modeling the interplay of behavioral adaptation.自主行为改变和政策干预下的 COVID-19 大流行期间行为改变:理解和建模行为适应的相互作用。
PLoS One. 2024 May 2;19(5):e0296145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296145. eCollection 2024.
10
Toward trustworthy COVID-19 interventions: Building vaccine trust through community-university partnerships.迈向可信赖的 COVID-19 干预措施:通过社区-大学伙伴关系建立疫苗信任。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 27;19(3):e0300872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300872. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Political polarization in US residents' COVID-19 risk perceptions, policy preferences, and protective behaviors.美国居民对新冠病毒疾病风险的认知、政策偏好及防护行为中的政治两极分化现象
J Risk Uncertain. 2020;61(2):177-194. doi: 10.1007/s11166-020-09336-3. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
2
Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.党派之间在保持社交距离方面的分歧与 COVID-19 大流行期间的健康结果有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1186-1197. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
3
Media trust and infection mitigating behaviours during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的媒体信任与感染缓解行为。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003323.
4
Trends and Predictors of COVID-19 Information Sources and Their Relationship With Knowledge and Beliefs Related to the Pandemic: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study.COVID-19 信息来源的趋势和预测因素及其与大流行相关知识和信念的关系:全国性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Oct 8;6(4):e21071. doi: 10.2196/21071.
5
Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency.健康保护行为、社交媒体使用与新冠疫情公共卫生紧急事件期间的阴谋论信仰。
Psychol Med. 2021 Jul;51(10):1763-1769. doi: 10.1017/S003329172000224X. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
6
Fake medical news: avoiding pitfalls and perils.虚假医疗新闻:规避陷阱与风险。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Oct 4;7(4):e000142. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2019-000142. eCollection 2019.
7
2019-nCoV, fake news, and racism.2019新型冠状病毒、假新闻与种族主义。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):685-686. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30357-3. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
8
Systematic Literature Review on the Spread of Health-related Misinformation on Social Media.社交媒体上与健康相关的错误信息传播的系统文献综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Nov;240:112552. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
9
Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality.利用众包新闻来源质量判断来打击社交媒体上的错误信息。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 12;116(7):2521-2526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806781116. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
10
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.科学受众、错误信息和假新闻。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7662-7669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.