Suppr超能文献

评估公众对美国有关 COVID-19 公共信息来源信任的迅速下降。

An Assessment of the Rapid Decline of Trust in US Sources of Public Information about COVID-19.

机构信息

Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Health Commun. 2020 Oct 2;25(10):764-773. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1865487.

Abstract

We conducted a longitidinal assessment of 806 respondents in March, 2020 in the US to examine the trustworthiness of sources of information about COVID-19. Respondents were recontacted after four months. Information sources included mainstream media, state health departments, the CDC, the White House, and a well-known university. We also examined how demographics, political partisanship, and skepticism about COVID-19 were associated with the perceived trustworthiness of information sources and decreased trustworthiness over time. At baseline, the majority of respondants reported high trust in COVID-19 information from state health departments (75.6%), the CDC (80.9%), and a university (Johns Hopkins, 81.1%). Mainstream media was trusted by less than half the respondents (41.2%), and the White House was the least trusted source (30.9%). At the 4-month follow-up, a significant decrease in trustworthiness in all five sources of COVID-19 information was observed. The most pronounced reductions were from the CDC and the White House. In multivariate analyses, factors associated with rating the CDC, state health department, and a university as trustworthy sources of COVID-19 information were political party affiliation, level of education, and skepticism about COVID-19. The most consistent predictor of decreased trust was political party affiliation, with Democrats as compared to Republicans less likely to report decreased trust across all sources.

摘要

我们在 2020 年 3 月对美国的 806 名受访者进行了一项纵向评估,以研究他们对 COVID-19 相关信息来源的信任程度。四个月后对受访者进行了重新联系。信息来源包括主流媒体、州卫生部门、CDC、白宫和一所知名大学。我们还研究了人口统计学特征、政治党派立场以及对 COVID-19 的怀疑态度如何与信息来源的感知可信度以及随着时间的推移可信度的下降相关。在基线时,大多数受访者报告对州卫生部门(75.6%)、CDC(80.9%)和一所大学(约翰霍普金斯大学,81.1%)的 COVID-19 信息高度信任。不到一半的受访者信任主流媒体(41.2%),而白宫是最不受信任的来源(30.9%)。在 4 个月的随访中,观察到对所有五种 COVID-19 信息来源的信任度显著下降。CDC 和白宫的降幅最大。在多变量分析中,与将 CDC、州卫生部门和大学评为 COVID-19 信息可信来源相关的因素包括党派、教育程度和对 COVID-19 的怀疑态度。最一致的降低信任度的预测因素是党派,与共和党相比,民主党在所有来源中报告信任度下降的可能性更小。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Can the 19th-century speak to today's science communication challenges?19世纪能应对当今科学传播的挑战吗?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Jun 4;121(23):e2409349121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2409349121. Epub 2024 May 29.

本文引用的文献

6
Fake medical news: avoiding pitfalls and perils.虚假医疗新闻:规避陷阱与风险。
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Oct 4;7(4):e000142. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2019-000142. eCollection 2019.
7
2019-nCoV, fake news, and racism.2019新型冠状病毒、假新闻与种族主义。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):685-686. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30357-3. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
10
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news.科学受众、错误信息和假新闻。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7662-7669. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805871115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验