• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类表示学习。

Human Representation Learning.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA; email:

Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA.

出版信息

Annu Rev Neurosci. 2021 Jul 8;44:253-273. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-092920-120559. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

DOI:10.1146/annurev-neuro-092920-120559
PMID:33730510
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9707489/
Abstract

The central theme of this review is the dynamic interaction between information selection and learning. We pose a fundamental question about this interaction: How do we learn what features of our experiences are worth learning about? In humans, this process depends on attention and memory, two cognitive functions that together constrain representations of the world to features that are relevant for goal attainment. Recent evidence suggests that the representations shaped by attention and memory are themselves inferred from experience with each task. We review this evidence and place it in the context of work that has explicitly characterized representation learning as statistical inference. We discuss how inference can be scaled to real-world decisions by approximating beliefs based on a small number of experiences. Finally, we highlight some implications of this inference process for human decision-making in social environments.

摘要

本篇综述的核心主题是信息选择与学习之间的动态交互。我们针对这一交互提出了一个基本问题:我们如何了解我们的经验中哪些特征值得学习?在人类中,这一过程依赖于注意力和记忆,这两种认知功能共同将世界的表示约束为与目标实现相关的特征。最近的证据表明,注意力和记忆所塑造的表示本身是根据每个任务的经验推断出来的。我们综述了这些证据,并将其置于明确将表示学习描述为统计推断的工作背景下。我们讨论了如何通过基于少量经验来近似置信度,从而将推断扩展到现实世界的决策中。最后,我们强调了这一推断过程对人类在社会环境中进行决策的一些影响。

相似文献

1
Human Representation Learning.人类表示学习。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2021 Jul 8;44:253-273. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-092920-120559. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
2
[Study of the categorization process among patients with eating disorders: a new cognitive approach to psychopathology].[饮食失调患者分类过程的研究:精神病理学的一种新认知方法]
Encephale. 2005 Jan-Feb;31(1 Pt 1):82-91. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82376-0.
3
Representation in natural and artificial agents: an embodied cognitive science perspective.自然与人工智能体中的表征:一种具身认知科学视角
Z Naturforsch C J Biosci. 1998 Jul-Aug;53(7-8):480-503. doi: 10.1515/znc-1998-7-804.
4
Holistic Reinforcement Learning: The Role of Structure and Attention.整体强化学习:结构与注意力的作用。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Apr;23(4):278-292. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
5
The Future of Decisions From Experience: Connecting Real-World Decision Problems to Cognitive Processes.经验决策的未来:将现实世界的决策问题与认知过程联系起来。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):82-102. doi: 10.1177/17456916231179138. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
6
A dynamic context model of interactive behavior.互动行为的动态情境模型。
Cogn Sci. 2011 Jul;35(5):874-904. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01173.x. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
7
Inferring relevance in a changing world.推断变化世界中的相关性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Jan 24;5:189. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00189. eCollection 2011.
8
Static internal representation of dynamic situations reveals time compaction in human cognition.动态情境的静态内部表征揭示了人类认知中的时间压缩。
J Adv Res. 2020 Aug 14;28:111-125. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.008. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Top-down attention based on object representation and incremental memory for knowledge building and inference.基于对象表示和增量记忆的自上而下的注意力,用于知识构建和推理。
Neural Netw. 2013 Oct;46:9-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 Apr 8.
10
Executive attention and task switching in category learning: evidence for stimulus-dependent representation.类别学习中的执行性注意与任务转换:刺激依赖表征的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Jun;36(4):749-61. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.4.749.

引用本文的文献

1
Goals and the Structure of Experience.目标与经验的结构
ArXiv. 2025 Aug 20:arXiv:2508.15013v1.
2
Feature-based reward learning shapes human social learning strategies.基于特征的奖励学习塑造人类社会学习策略。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jul 23. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02269-4.
3
Collective cooperative intelligence.集体合作智慧。

本文引用的文献

1
Learning from other minds: An optimistic critique of reinforcement learning models of social learning.向他人学习:对社会学习强化学习模型的乐观批判。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Apr;38:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
2
The people around you are inside your head: Social context shapes spontaneous thought.你周围的人存在于你的脑海中:社会环境塑造自发思维。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Nov;150(11):2375-2386. doi: 10.1037/xge0001057. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
3
Fixation patterns in simple choice reflect optimal information sampling.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jun 24;122(25):e2319948121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2319948121. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
4
Humans learn generalizable representations through efficient coding.人类通过高效编码学习可泛化的表征。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 29;16(1):3989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58848-6.
5
Free recall is shaped by inference and scaffolded by event structure.自由回忆受推理影响,并以事件结构为支撑。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Apr 26;3(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00243-4.
6
Functional Neurological Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Complex and Potentially Significant Relationship.功能性神经障碍与自闭症谱系障碍:一种复杂且可能具有重要意义的关系。
Brain Behav. 2024 Dec;14(12):e70168. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70168.
7
Contributions of Attention to Learning in Multidimensional Reward Environments.在多维奖励环境中注意力对学习的贡献。
J Neurosci. 2025 Feb 12;45(7):e2300232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2300-23.2024.
8
An inductive bias for slowly changing features in human reinforcement learning.人类强化学习中对缓慢变化特征的归纳偏差。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Nov 25;20(11):e1012568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012568. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
The Ubiquity of Time in Latent-cause Inference.时间在潜在因果推断中的普遍性。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2024 Nov 1;36(11):2442-2454. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_02231.
10
Social uncertainty in the digital world.数字世界中的社会不确定性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Apr;28(4):286-289. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
简单选择中的注视模式反映了最优信息采样。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Mar 26;17(3):e1008863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008863. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Biased evaluations emerge from inferring hidden causes.偏见的评价源于对潜在原因的推断。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Sep;5(9):1180-1189. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01065-0. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
5
The Tolman-Eichenbaum Machine: Unifying Space and Relational Memory through Generalization in the Hippocampal Formation.托尔曼-埃克恩鲍姆机器:通过海马结构中的泛化统一空间和关系记忆。
Cell. 2020 Nov 25;183(5):1249-1263.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.024. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
6
Capturing human categorization of natural images by combining deep networks and cognitive models.通过将深度网络和认知模型相结合来捕捉人类对自然图像的分类。
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 27;11(1):5418. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18946-z.
7
Revealing the multidimensional mental representations of natural objects underlying human similarity judgements.揭示人类相似性判断所基于的自然物体的多维心理表象。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1173-1185. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00951-3. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
8
Anatomically segregated basal ganglia pathways allow parallel behavioral modulation.解剖分离的基底神经节通路允许并行的行为调节。
Nat Neurosci. 2020 Nov;23(11):1388-1398. doi: 10.1038/s41593-020-00712-5. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
9
Altercentric Cognition: How Others Influence Our Cognitive Processing.离心认知:他人如何影响我们的认知加工。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Nov;24(11):945-959. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
10
Transferring structural knowledge across cognitive maps in humans and models.在人类和模型中跨认知图转移结构知识。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 22;11(1):4783. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18254-6.