Yan Wenjun, Huang Lu, Xia Liming, Gu Shengjia, Yan Fuhua, Wang Yuanyuan, Tao Qian
Biomedical Engineering Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China (W.Y., Y.W.); Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China (L.H., L.X.); Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China (S.G., F.Y.); and Division of Image Processing, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands (Q.T.).
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Jul 1;2(4):e190195. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020190195. eCollection 2020 Jul.
To quantitatively evaluate the generalizability of a deep learning segmentation tool to MRI data from scanners of different MRI manufacturers and to improve the cross-manufacturer performance by using a manufacturer-adaptation strategy.
This retrospective study included 150 cine MRI datasets from three MRI manufacturers, acquired between 2017 and 2018 ( = 50 for manufacturer 1, manufacturer 2, and manufacturer 3). Three convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained to segment the left ventricle (LV), using datasets exclusively from images from a single manufacturer. A generative adversarial network (GAN) was trained to adapt the input image before segmentation. The LV segmentation performance, end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), LV mass, and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were evaluated before and after manufacturer adaptation. Paired Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed.
The segmentation CNNs exhibited a significant performance drop when applied to datasets from different manufacturers (Dice reduced from 89.7% ± 2.3 [standard deviation] to 68.7% ± 10.8, < .05, from 90.6% ± 2.1 to 59.5% ± 13.3, < .05, from 89.2% ± 2.3 to 64.1% ± 12.0, < .05, for manufacturer 1, 2, and 3, respectively). After manufacturer adaptation, the segmentation performance was significantly improved (from 68.7% ± 10.8 to 84.3% ± 6.2, < .05, from 72.4% ± 10.2 to 85.7% ± 6.5, < .05, for manufacturer 2 and 3, respectively). Quantitative LV function parameters were also significantly improved. For LVEF, the manufacturer adaptation increased the Pearson correlation from 0.005 to 0.89 for manufacturer 2 and from 0.77 to 0.94 for manufacturer 3.
A segmentation CNN well trained on datasets from one MRI manufacturer may not generalize well to datasets from other manufacturers. The proposed manufacturer adaptation can largely improve the generalizability of a deep learning segmentation tool without additional annotation.© RSNA, 2020.
定量评估深度学习分割工具对来自不同MRI制造商扫描仪的MRI数据的通用性,并通过使用制造商适应策略提高跨制造商性能。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2017年至2018年期间从三家MRI制造商获取的150个心脏电影MRI数据集(制造商1、制造商2和制造商3各50个)。使用仅来自单个制造商图像的数据集训练三个卷积神经网络(CNN)来分割左心室(LV)。训练一个生成对抗网络(GAN)在分割前对输入图像进行适配。在制造商适配前后评估LV分割性能、舒张末期容积(EDV)、收缩末期容积(ESV)、LV质量和LV射血分数(LVEF)。进行配对Wilcoxon符号秩检验。
当应用于来自不同制造商的数据集时,分割CNN表现出显著的性能下降(Dice系数从89.7%±2.3[标准差]降至68.7%±10.8,P<.05;从90.6%±2.1降至59.5%±13.3,P<.05;从89.2%±2.3降至64.1%±12.0,P<.05,分别对应制造商1、2和3)。经过制造商适配后,分割性能显著提高(制造商2从68.7%±10.8提高到84.3%±6.2,P<.05;制造商3从72.4%±10.2提高到85.7%±6.5,P<.05)。定量LV功能参数也显著改善。对于LVEF,制造商适配使制造商2的Pearson相关性从0.005提高到0.89,制造商3从0.77提高到0.94。
在一个MRI制造商的数据集上训练良好的分割CNN可能对其他制造商的数据集通用性不佳。所提出的制造商适配可以在无需额外标注的情况下大幅提高深度学习分割工具的通用性。©RSNA,2020。