Suppr超能文献

使用定量实时聚合酶链反应比较石榴皮提取物与氯己定对高龋风险个体的抗菌作用:一项随机三盲对照临床试验

The Antimicrobial Effect of Pomegranate Peel Extract versus Chlorhexidine in High Caries Risk Individuals Using Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction: A Randomized Triple-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Jacob Benoy, Malli Sureshbabu Nivedhitha, Ranjan Manish, Ranganath Aishwarya, Siddique Riluwan

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Velappanchavady, Poonamalle High Road, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600077, India.

出版信息

Int J Dent. 2021 Aug 30;2021:5563945. doi: 10.1155/2021/5563945. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the antibacterial effectiveness of chlorhexidine and PPE oral rinse on , , and , in clinical salivary samples of patients with advanced stages of dental caries at baseline and two and four weeks with PCR technique. This triple-blind randomized clinical trial involved 60 high caries risk adult patients, 19-59 years of age, randomly allocated into two groups of 30 subjects each. The intervention group received pomegranate peel extract mouthwash, whereas the control group received chlorhexidine mouthwash. Unstimulated pooled saliva was collected from the floor of the mouth before and after the intervention. The quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction was employed to analyze the bacterial copies of each salivary sample at baseline and two and four weeks. The significance level was fixed at 5% ( = 0.05). Overall comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness across both groups revealed insignificant outcomes. The control group evinced a significant reduction in between a specific time, i.e., baseline and 4 weeks (=0.043). PPE oral rinse as a natural product or ecological alternative was effective in disrupting activity across all microorganisms tested in this triple-blind RCT; however, the nutraceutical, when compared to chlorhexidine, was not as effective against .

摘要

本研究的目的是采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术,比较洗必泰和石榴皮提取物漱口水对龋病晚期患者临床唾液样本中[具体细菌名称未给出]、[具体细菌名称未给出]和[具体细菌名称未给出]在基线、两周和四周时的抗菌效果。这项三盲随机临床试验纳入了60名19至59岁的高龋风险成年患者,随机分为两组,每组30名受试者。干预组接受石榴皮提取物漱口水,而对照组接受洗必泰漱口水。在干预前后从口腔底部收集非刺激性混合唾液。采用定量实时聚合酶链反应分析每个唾液样本在基线、两周和四周时的细菌拷贝数。显著性水平设定为5%(α = 0.05)。两组抗菌效果的总体比较显示结果无统计学意义。对照组在特定时间(即基线和4周)之间[具体细菌名称未给出]有显著减少(P = 0.043)。石榴皮提取物漱口水作为一种天然产品或生态替代品,在这项三盲随机对照试验中对所有测试微生物的活性破坏有效;然而,与洗必泰相比,这种营养保健品对[具体细菌名称未给出]的效果不佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61f/8424245/514aeb69a899/IJD2021-5563945.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验