Department of Economics and Business, University of Almería, Carretera de Sacramento s/n, 04120 Almería, Spain.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 8;18(24):12953. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182412953.
Vaccine-hesitancy and political populism are positively associated across Europe: those countries in which their citizens present higher populist attitudes are those that also have higher vaccine-hesitancy rates. The same key driver fuels them: distrust in institutions, elites, and experts. The reluctance of citizens to be vaccinated fits perfectly in populist political agendas because is a source of instability that has a distinctive characteristic known as the "small pockets" issue. It means that the level at which immunization coverage needs to be maintained to be effective is so high that a small number of vaccine-hesitants have enormous adverse effects on herd immunity and epidemic spread. In pandemic and post-pandemic scenarios, vaccine-hesitancy could be used by populists as one of the most effective tools for generating distrust. This research presents an invariant measurement model applied to 27 EU + UK countries (27,524 participants) that segments the different behaviours found, and gives social-marketing recommendations for coping with the vaccine-hesitancy problem when used for generating distrust.
在那些公民表现出更高民粹主义态度的国家,疫苗犹豫率也更高。同样的关键驱动因素推动了它们的发展:对机构、精英和专家的不信任。公民不愿接种疫苗完全符合民粹主义政治议程,因为这是一种不稳定的根源,具有一个独特的特征,即“小群体”问题。这意味着为了有效维持免疫接种覆盖率,需要达到如此高的水平,以至于少数疫苗犹豫者对群体免疫和疫情传播会产生巨大的不利影响。在大流行和大流行后情景下,民粹主义者可能会将疫苗犹豫作为产生不信任的最有效工具之一。本研究提出了一个不变测量模型,应用于 27 个欧盟+英国国家(27524 名参与者),对发现的不同行为进行细分,并为应对用于产生不信任的疫苗犹豫问题提供社会营销建议。