• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用不同成像设备测量中央角膜厚度:超声角膜测厚法、非接触式镜面显微镜检查法和眼压-角膜测厚法。

Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Different Imaging Devices: Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Tono-Pachymetry.

作者信息

Ceylan Ali, Onal Irem, Mergen Burak, Yildirim Yusuf

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 Feb 18;7(1):54-58. doi: 10.14744/bej.2022.82787. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.14744/bej.2022.82787
PMID:35265803
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8874255/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Investigation of the compatibility between central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements in healthy eyes by comparing standard ultrasound pachymetry (USP) with noncontact tono-pachymetry (NCT) and specular microscopy (SM) devices was aimed.

METHODS

Forty-five eyes of 45 healthy volunteers aged between 18 and 60 years were included in this study. CCT of all cases was evaluated with USP, NCT, and SM devices. The same examiner performed all examinations. Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to evaluate the agreement between instruments.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 31±10.2 years. Fifteen (33.3%) cases were male and 30 (66.7%) were female. The mean CCT measured using NCT (559.3±39 µm) was significantly higher than those measured using SM (534.8±41 µm) and USP (542.6±43 µm, p<0.001). Bland-Altman analysis showed that the difference between the first, second, and third measurements was evenly dispersed around the mean, with no clear trend toward over- or underestimation by either NCT, USP, or SM. The 95% limits of agreements were 0.30-48.72 µm for NCT, -12.63-46.04 µm for the USP, and -24.41-8.80 µm for the SM. Correlation analysis between the three devices showed a very strong positive correlation (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Significant differences were observed between CCT measurements in healthy individuals used in ophthalmology practice and performed with different devices. This situation should draw attention to the fact that in diseases such as glaucoma and endothelial insufficiency, corneal thickness monitoring should be done with the same device and the devices should not be used interchangeably.

摘要

目的

旨在通过比较标准超声角膜测厚法(USP)与非接触眼压角膜厚度测量法(NCT)以及镜面显微镜检查(SM)设备,研究健康眼睛中央角膜厚度(CCT)测量值之间的兼容性。

方法

本研究纳入了45名年龄在18至60岁之间的健康志愿者的45只眼睛。所有病例的CCT均使用USP、NCT和SM设备进行评估。所有检查均由同一名检查者进行。采用 Bland-Altman 图和组内相关系数来评估仪器之间的一致性。

结果

患者的平均年龄为31±10.2岁。15例(33.3%)为男性,30例(66.7%)为女性。使用NCT测量的平均CCT(559.3±39 µm)显著高于使用SM(534.8±41 µm)和USP(542.6±43 µm,p<0.001)测量的结果。Bland-Altman分析表明,第一次、第二次和第三次测量之间的差异在平均值周围均匀分布,NCT、USP或SM均无明显的高估或低估趋势。NCT的95%一致性界限为0.30 - 48.72 µm,USP为 -12.63 - 46.04 µm,SM为 -24.41 - 8.80 µm。三种设备之间的相关性分析显示出非常强的正相关性(p<0.001)。

结论

在眼科实践中,使用不同设备对健康个体进行CCT测量时观察到显著差异。这种情况应引起注意,即在青光眼和内皮功能不全等疾病中,角膜厚度监测应使用同一设备,且这些设备不应互换使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e6/8874255/554632c2d762/BEJ-7-54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e6/8874255/ceae750b57c5/BEJ-7-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e6/8874255/554632c2d762/BEJ-7-54-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e6/8874255/ceae750b57c5/BEJ-7-54-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0e6/8874255/554632c2d762/BEJ-7-54-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Different Imaging Devices: Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Tono-Pachymetry.使用不同成像设备测量中央角膜厚度:超声角膜测厚法、非接触式镜面显微镜检查法和眼压-角膜测厚法。
Beyoglu Eye J. 2022 Feb 18;7(1):54-58. doi: 10.14744/bej.2022.82787. eCollection 2022.
2
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.标准超声角膜测厚法、角膜地形图、眼压-角膜测厚法及眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jul;43(7):866-872. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1461910. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
3
Comparison of Six Methods of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Healthy Eyes.健康眼睛中央角膜厚度测量六种方法的比较
Beyoglu Eye J. 2021 Feb 12;6(1):7-13. doi: 10.14744/bej.2021.17894. eCollection 2021.
4
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.超声角膜测厚仪、非接触式角膜内皮显微镜及频域光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的比较
Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(6):782-787. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2018.1448091. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
5
Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera.使用超声测厚法、非接触式角膜内皮显微镜和高分辨率Scheimpflug相机对健康眼睛的中央角膜厚度进行比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb;43(2):363-370. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02431-1. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
6
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Optical and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Glaucoma Patients and Elderly and Young Controls.青光眼患者及老年和青年对照者的光学和超声角膜测厚术测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2019 Jun;28(6):540-545. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001231.
7
Comparison and evaluation of central corneal thickness using 2 new noncontact specular microscopes and conventional pachymetry devices.使用 2 种新型非接触式共焦显微镜和传统角膜测厚仪对中央角膜厚度进行比较和评估。
Cornea. 2014 Jun;33(6):576-81. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000000113.
8
Repeatability and agreement of CCT measurement in myopia using entacam and ultrasound pachymetry.使用眼前节分析仪(Entacam)和超声角膜测厚仪测量近视患者中央角膜厚度的可重复性和一致性
Int J Ophthalmol. 2012;5(3):329-33. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2012.03.15. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
9
Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy.超声角膜测厚仪、角膜地形图、谱域光学相干断层扫描和非接触镜面反射显微镜测量的中央角膜厚度比较。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2023 Jun;42:103527. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103527. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
10
Evaluation of a recently developed noncontact specular microscope in comparison with conventional pachymetry devices.与传统测厚仪相比,对一种新开发的非接触式角膜内皮显微镜的评估。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2010 Sep-Oct;20(5):831-8. doi: 10.1177/112067211002000504.

引用本文的文献

1
Ocular Dominance and Its Association With Central Corneal Thickness: An Observational Study in Central India.眼优势及其与中央角膜厚度的关联:印度中部的一项观察性研究。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 27;15(6):e41033. doi: 10.7759/cureus.41033. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.标准超声角膜测厚法、角膜地形图、眼压-角膜测厚法及眼前节光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2018 Jul;43(7):866-872. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2018.1461910. Epub 2018 Apr 13.
2
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.超声角膜测厚仪、非接触式角膜内皮显微镜及频域光学相干断层扫描测量中央角膜厚度的比较
Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33(6):782-787. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2018.1448091. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
3
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Using Ultrasonic Pachymetry, Anterior Segment OCT and Noncontact Specular Microscopy.
使用超声角膜测厚法、眼前节光学相干断层扫描和非接触式镜面显微镜测量中央角膜厚度的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2017 Oct;26(10):860-865. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000745.
4
Repeatability and reproducibility of measurements using a NT-530P noncontact tono/pachymeter and correlation of central corneal thickness with intraocular pressure.使用 NT-530P 非接触眼压/角膜测厚仪进行测量的可重复性和再现性,以及中央角膜厚度与眼内压的相关性。
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:370592. doi: 10.1155/2013/370592. Epub 2013 Oct 8.
5
Accuracy and repeatability of a new tono-pachymeter for measuring central corneal thickness.新型眼压角膜厚度计测量中央角膜厚度的准确性和可重复性。
Eye Contact Lens. 2012 May;38(3):158-63. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0b013e31824b005b.
6
Central corneal thickness measurements: using an ultrasonic instrument and 4 optical instruments.中央角膜厚度测量:使用超声仪器和 4 种光学仪器。
Cornea. 2011 Nov;30(11):1238-43. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182152051.
7
Repeatability of intra-ocular pressure and central corneal thickness measurements provided by a non-contact method of tonometry and pachymetry.非接触眼压计和角膜测厚仪测量眼压和中央角膜厚度的重复性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Mar;249(3):429-34. doi: 10.1007/s00417-010-1550-3. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
8
Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement using ultrasonic pachymetry, rotating Scheimpflug camera, and scanning-slit topography.比较超声角膜测厚仪、旋转式 Scheimpflug 相机和扫描式角膜地形图仪测量中央角膜厚度。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;150(6):780-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.06.013. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
9
Assessment of central corneal thickness in normal, keratoconus, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes using Scheimpflug imaging, spectral domain optical coherence tomography, and ultrasound pachymetry.应用 Scheimpflug 成像系统、频域光学相干断层扫描仪和超声角膜测厚仪评估正常眼、圆锥角膜眼和 LASIK 术后眼的中央角膜厚度。
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010 Jun;36(6):954-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.12.033.
10
Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data.真实眼压的评估:理论与实际数据之间的差距。
Surv Ophthalmol. 2008 May-Jun;53(3):203-18. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2008.02.005.