• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性中级、高级和精英级竞技攀岩者上身峰值力量和力量发展速率的差异。

Differences in Upper-Body Peak Force and Rate of Force Development in Male Intermediate, Advanced, and Elite Sport Climbers.

作者信息

Vereide Vegard, Andersen Vidar, Hermans Espen, Kalland Jarle, Saeterbakken Atle Hole, Stien Nicolay

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Sogndal, Norway.

Faculty of Education, Arts and Sports, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jun 28;4:888061. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.888061. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fspor.2022.888061
PMID:35837246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9274001/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the difference in climbing-specific strength and rate of force development (RFD) between intermediate, advanced, and elite male sport climbers. Seventy-eight male climbers were recruited and divided into groups based on the International Rock Climbing Research Association (IRCRA) numerical (1-32) grading system (intermediate (10-17) group (IG; = 28)), advanced (18-23) group (AG; = 30) and elite (24-27) group (EG; = 20). Peak force ( ) and average force ( ) were measured while performing an isometric pull-up on a 23 mm thick campus rung. RFD was calculated from the onset of force to maximal peak force. The elite group performed better in all test parameters than the advanced ( : 39.7%, ES = 1.40, < 0.001; : 45.6%, ES = 4.60, < 0.001; RFD: 74.9%, ES = 1.42, = 0.001) and intermediate group ( : 95.7%, ES = 2.54, < 0.001, : 131.1%, ES = 5.84, < 0.001, RFD: 154.4%, ES = 2.21, = 0.001). Moreover, the advanced group demonstrated greater (40.1%, ES = 1.24, < 0.001), (59.1%, ES = 1.57, < 0.001) and RFD (45.5%, ES = 1.42, = 0.046), than the intermediate group. Finally, climbing performance displayed strong correlations with ( = 0.73, < 0.001) and ( = 0.77, < 0.001), and a moderate correlation with RFD ( = 0.64, < 0.001). In conclusion, maximal force and RFD in a climbing specific test are greater among climbers on higher performance levels. Independent of climbing level there is a moderate-to-strong association between maximal and rapid force production and climbing performance.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查中级、高级和精英男性竞技攀岩者在攀岩特定力量和力量发展速率(RFD)方面的差异。招募了78名男性攀岩者,并根据国际攀岩研究协会(IRCRA)的数字(1 - 32)分级系统将他们分为几组:中级(10 - 17)组(IG;n = 28)、高级(18 - 23)组(AG;n = 30)和精英(24 - 27)组(EG;n = 20)。在一个23毫米厚的训练横杠上进行等长引体向上时,测量峰值力量( )和平均力量( )。RFD是从力量开始到最大峰值力量计算得出的。精英组在所有测试参数上的表现均优于高级组( :39.7%,ES = 1.40,p < 0.001; :45.6%,ES = 4.60,p < 0.001;RFD:74.9%,ES = 1.42,p = 0.001)和中级组( :95.7%,ES = 2.54,p < 0.001, :131.1%,ES = 5.84,p < 0.001,RFD:154.4%,ES = 2.21,p = 0.001)。此外,高级组在 (40.1%,ES = 1.24,p < 0.001)、 (59.1%,ES = 1.57,p < 0.001)和RFD(45.5%,ES = 1.42,p = 0.046)方面表现优于中级组。最后,攀岩表现与 (r = 0.73,p < 0.001)和 (r = 0.77,p < 0.001)呈强相关,与RFD呈中度相关(r = 0.64,p < 0.001)。总之,在攀岩特定测试中,表现水平较高的攀岩者的最大力量和RFD更大。无论攀岩水平如何,最大力量和快速力量产生与攀岩表现之间存在中度到强的关联。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd8/9274001/9ec871ddd84b/fspor-04-888061-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd8/9274001/f69ade6862b4/fspor-04-888061-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd8/9274001/9ec871ddd84b/fspor-04-888061-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd8/9274001/f69ade6862b4/fspor-04-888061-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fd8/9274001/9ec871ddd84b/fspor-04-888061-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in Upper-Body Peak Force and Rate of Force Development in Male Intermediate, Advanced, and Elite Sport Climbers.男性中级、高级和精英级竞技攀岩者上身峰值力量和力量发展速率的差异。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Jun 28;4:888061. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.888061. eCollection 2022.
2
Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.上半身力量发展速率和最大力量可区分运动攀岩的表现水平。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 26;16(3):e0249353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249353. eCollection 2021.
3
The Effects of 10 Weeks Hangboard Training on Climbing Specific Maximal Strength, Explosive Strength, and Finger Endurance.10周悬垂训练对攀岩专项最大力量、爆发力和手指耐力的影响。
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Apr 27;4:888158. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.888158. eCollection 2022.
4
Effects of Two vs. Four Weekly Campus Board Training Sessions on Bouldering Performance and Climbing-Specific Tests in Advanced and Elite Climbers.每周两次与每周四次校园板训练课程对高级和精英攀岩者的抱石表现和攀岩专项测试的影响。
J Sports Sci Med. 2021 May 25;20(3):438-447. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2021.438. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers.对比顶绳攀登者和先锋攀登者的专项力量和耐力。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0222529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222529. eCollection 2019.
6
The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers.在中级攀岩者中优先进行先锋攀登或抱石攀登的效果。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Apr 22;3:661167. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.661167. eCollection 2021.
7
Four Weeks of Finger Grip Training Increases the Rate of Force Development and the Maximal Force in Elite and Top World-Ranking Climbers.四周手指握力训练可提高精英和顶级世界级攀岩运动员的力量发展速度和最大力量。
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Sep;33(9):2471-2480. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002230.
8
Persistent Unilateral Force Production Deficits Following Hand Injury in Experienced Climbers: A Reliability and Retrospective Injury Study.经验丰富的攀岩者手部受伤后持续存在的单侧力量产生缺陷:一项可靠性和回顾性损伤研究
Wilderness Environ Med. 2023 Mar;34(1):22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2022.10.001. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
9
Body Composition, Anthropometric Parameters, and Strength-Endurance Characteristics of Sport Climbers: A Systematic Review.运动攀岩者的身体成分、人体测量参数和力量耐力特征:系统评价。
J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Jun 1;37(6):1339-1348. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004464. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
10
Prevalence of Disordered Eating Among International Sport Lead Rock Climbers.国际顶尖攀岩运动员中饮食失调的患病率
Front Sports Act Living. 2020 Jul 24;2:86. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2020.00086. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Five weeks of dynamic finger flexor strength training on bouldering performance and climbing-specific strength tests. A randomized controlled trial.为期五周的动态手指屈肌力量训练对抱石表现和特定攀岩力量测试的影响。一项随机对照试验。
Front Physiol. 2024 Oct 10;15:1461820. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1461820. eCollection 2024.
2
Sport climbing performance determinants and functional testing methods: A systematic review.竞技攀岩成绩的决定因素及功能测试方法:一项系统综述。
J Sport Health Sci. 2024 Aug 29;14:100974. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2024.100974.
3
Development of Specific Motor Skills through System Wall Bouldering Training: A Pilot Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Prioritizing Lead or Boulder Climbing Among Intermediate Climbers.在中级攀岩者中优先进行先锋攀登或抱石攀登的效果。
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Apr 22;3:661167. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.661167. eCollection 2021.
2
Muscle strength and endurance in high-level rock climbers.高水平攀岩运动员的肌肉力量和耐力。
Sports Biomech. 2024 Aug;23(8):1057-1072. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2021.1916577. Epub 2021 May 3.
3
Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.
通过系统攀岩墙训练发展特定运动技能:一项初步研究。
Transl Sports Med. 2024 Jul 8;2024:5584962. doi: 10.1155/2024/5584962. eCollection 2024.
4
The Connection Between Resistance Training, Climbing Performance, and Injury Prevention.阻力训练、攀岩表现与 injury prevention 之间的联系。 注:这里“injury prevention”直译为“损伤预防”,结合语境可能更通顺的表达可以是“预防受伤” 。完整准确译文为:阻力训练、攀岩表现与预防受伤之间的联系。
Sports Med Open. 2024 Jan 19;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40798-024-00677-w.
5
Physical performance testing in climbing-A systematic review.攀岩运动中的身体机能测试——一项系统综述
Front Sports Act Living. 2023 May 9;5:1130812. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1130812. eCollection 2023.
上半身力量发展速率和最大力量可区分运动攀岩的表现水平。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 26;16(3):e0249353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249353. eCollection 2021.
4
Performance Assessment for Rock Climbers: The International Rock Climbing Research Association Sport-Specific Test Battery.攀岩运动员表现评估:国际攀岩研究协会专项测试组合。
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Sep 1;16(9):1242-1252. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0672. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
5
Anthropometry and performance characteristics of recreational advanced to elite female rock climbers.业余高水平到精英级女性攀岩运动员的人体测量学和表现特征。
J Sports Sci. 2021 Jan;39(1):48-56. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1804784. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
6
Reliability and Validity of a Method for the Assessment of Sport Rock Climbers' Isometric Finger Strength.一种评估运动攀岩者等长手指力量的方法的可靠性和有效性。
J Strength Cond Res. 2022 Aug 1;36(8):2277-2282. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003548. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
7
Comparison of climbing-specific strength and endurance between lead and boulder climbers.对比顶绳攀登者和先锋攀登者的专项力量和耐力。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0222529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222529. eCollection 2019.
8
Determinants for success in climbing: A systematic review.攀登成功的决定因素:一项系统综述。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2019 Jul;17(3):91-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 May 3.
9
Rate of force development and maximal force: reliability and difference between non-climbers, skilled and international climbers.力量发展速率和最大力量:非攀岩者、熟练攀岩者和国际攀岩者的可靠性和差异。
Sports Biomech. 2021 Jun;20(4):495-506. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2019.1584236. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
10
Reliability and Validity of Finger Strength and Endurance Measurements in Rock Climbing.攀岩中手指力量和耐力测量的可靠性与有效性
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2018 Jun;89(2):246-254. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2018.1441484. Epub 2018 Mar 26.