• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

TikTok 上有关甲状腺癌的信息质量高吗?

Is TikTok a high-quality source of information on thyroid cancer?

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Endocrine. 2023 Aug;81(2):270-276. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03332-8. Epub 2023 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1007/s12020-023-03332-8
PMID:36840912
Abstract

PURPOSE

Increased Internet users tend to use online video platforms as a source of medical information. There are many thyroid cancer-related videos on TikTok, the most popular short-video application in China. However, quality evaluation of these videos remains absent. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of thyroid cancer-related videos on TikTok.

METHODS

A search was performed on TikTok with the keyword "thyroid cancer". The top 100 videos in the search results were selected. Characteristics of videos including video length, duration on TikTok, thumbs up, thumbs up/day, comments, comments/day, favorites, favorites/day, reposts, and reposts/day were collected. The Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), modified DISCERN (mDISCERN), Video Information and Quality Index (VIQI), and Global Quality Score (GQS) were applied to assess the quality of videos.

RESULTS

Among the 100 videos in this study, most were uploaded by surgical physicians (n = 50), and the most common topic was anatomy/basic facts (n = 21). The mean scores of the PEMAT, PEMAT-U, and PEMAT-A were 71.18 ± 16.56, 82.23 ± 15.00, and 44.00 ± 37.57, respectively. Among the five questions of the mDISCERN tool, 71, 90, 82, 9, and 28 videos were evaluated as "yes", respectively. The mean scores of mDISCERN, VIQI, and GQS were 2.80 ± 1.03, 14.87 ± 2.27, and 3.72 ± 1.00, respectively. The characteristics and quality of videos are significantly different based on the uploader and content.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of thyroid cancer information on TikTok is unsatisfactory. There is a need for high-quality thyroid cancer-related information on short-video platforms for patient education.

摘要

目的

随着互联网用户的增加,他们倾向于将在线视频平台作为获取医学信息的来源。在中国,最受欢迎的短视频应用程序 TikTok 上有许多与甲状腺癌相关的视频。然而,这些视频的质量评估仍然缺失。本研究的目的是评估 TikTok 上与甲状腺癌相关的视频质量。

方法

在 TikTok 上使用“甲状腺癌”作为关键词进行搜索。从搜索结果中选择前 100 个视频。收集视频的特征,包括视频长度、在 TikTok 上的时长、点赞数、点赞数/天、评论数、评论数/天、收藏数、收藏数/天、转发数和转发数/天。应用患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT)、改良 DISCERN(mDISCERN)、视频信息和质量指数(VIQI)和全球质量评分(GQS)来评估视频质量。

结果

在本研究的 100 个视频中,大多数视频由外科医生上传(n=50),最常见的主题是解剖/基础知识(n=21)。PEMAT、PEMAT-U 和 PEMAT-A 的平均得分分别为 71.18±16.56、82.23±15.00 和 44.00±37.57。在 mDISCERN 工具的五个问题中,分别有 71、90、82、9 和 28 个视频被评估为“是”。mDISCERN、VIQI 和 GQS 的平均得分分别为 2.80±1.03、14.87±2.27 和 3.72±1.00。根据上传者和内容,视频的特征和质量存在显著差异。

结论

TikTok 上甲状腺癌信息的质量不尽如人意。短视频平台上需要有高质量的甲状腺癌相关信息,以进行患者教育。

相似文献

1
Is TikTok a high-quality source of information on thyroid cancer?TikTok 上有关甲状腺癌的信息质量高吗?
Endocrine. 2023 Aug;81(2):270-276. doi: 10.1007/s12020-023-03332-8. Epub 2023 Feb 25.
2
Quality and content evaluation of thyroid eye disease treatment information on TikTok and Bilibili.TikTok和哔哩哔哩上甲状腺眼病治疗信息的质量与内容评估
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11147-y.
3
Assessing quality, reliability and accuracy of polycystic ovary syndrome-related content on TikTok: A video-based cross-sectional analysis.评估TikTok上多囊卵巢综合征相关内容的质量、可靠性和准确性:基于视频的横断面分析。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Feb 10. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.70007.
4
Search engines and short video apps as sources of information on acute pancreatitis in China: quality assessment and content assessment.中国搜索引擎和短视频应用作为急性胰腺炎信息来源的质量评估与内容评估
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;13:1578076. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1578076. eCollection 2025.
5
Information quality of videos related to esophageal cancer on tiktok, kwai, and bilibili: a cross-sectional study.抖音、快手和哔哩哔哩上与食管癌相关视频的信息质量:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2245. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23475-9.
6
The quality and reliability of short videos about premature ovarian failure on Bilibili and TikTok: Cross-sectional study.哔哩哔哩和抖音上关于卵巢早衰短视频的质量与可靠性:横断面研究
Digit Health. 2025 Jun 17;11:20552076251351077. doi: 10.1177/20552076251351077. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
7
Scrolling for Answers About Breast Implant Illness: Application of Validated Tools to Assess the Quality of Content on YouTube and TikTok.滚动查找关于隆胸疾病的答案:应用经过验证的工具评估YouTube和TikTok上内容的质量
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 Apr 2:22925503241234936. doi: 10.1177/22925503241234936.
8
Assessing the Video Content Quality of TikTok and Bilibili as Health Information Sources for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Cross-Sectional Study.评估抖音和哔哩哔哩作为系统性红斑狼疮健康信息来源的视频内容质量:一项横断面研究。
Int J Rheum Dis. 2025 Jun;28(6):e70341. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.70341.
9
The quality and reliability of short videos about hypertension on TikTok: a cross-sectional study.TikTok上关于高血压的短视频的质量和可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 11;15(1):25042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08680-1.
10
The Quality and Reliability of Online Videos as an Information Source of Public Health Education for Stroke Prevention in Mainland China: Electronic Media-Based Cross-Sectional Study.中国大陆在线视频作为中风预防公共卫生教育信息来源的质量与可靠性:基于电子媒体的横断面研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jul 21;5:e64891. doi: 10.2196/64891.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality, Reliability and Accuracy of Hyperthyroidism-Related Content on Social Media Platform TikTok.社交媒体平台TikTok上与甲状腺功能亢进相关内容的质量、可靠性和准确性。
Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2025 Sep;8(5):e70105. doi: 10.1002/edm2.70105.
2
Evaluating the reliability and quality of knee osteoarthritis educational content on TikTok and Bilibili: A cross-sectional content analysis.评估抖音和哔哩哔哩上膝骨关节炎教育内容的可靠性和质量:一项横断面内容分析。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 12;11:20552076251366390. doi: 10.1177/20552076251366390. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Evaluation of the quality and reliability of Chinese content about orthognathic surgery on BiliBili and TikTok: a cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Media and the Transformation of the Physician-Patient Relationship: Viewpoint.社交媒体与医患关系的转变:观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 24;23(12):e25230. doi: 10.2196/25230.
2
Characterizing the Content Related to Oral Health Education on TikTok.分析 TikTok 上与口腔健康教育相关的内容
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13260. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413260.
3
Short-Video Apps as a Health Information Source for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Information Quality Assessment of TikTok Videos.
哔哩哔哩和抖音上正颌外科中文内容的质量与可靠性评估:一项横断面研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 7;15(1):28967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13941-0.
4
YouTube and Bilibili as sources of information on oral cancer: cross-sectional content analysis study.YouTube和哔哩哔哩作为口腔癌信息来源:横断面内容分析研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21671. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02898-9.
5
"Do You Know What Birth Control Actually Does to Your Body?": Assessing Contraceptive Information on TikTok.《你知道节育实际上对你的身体有什么影响吗?》:评估TikTok上的避孕信息。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70025.
6
The content quality and educational significance of early childhood caries on short video platforms.短视频平台上幼儿龋齿的内容质量与教育意义
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 9;25(1):1713. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22962-3.
7
Evaluating the Content and Quality of Videos Related to Hypertrophic Scarring on TikTok in China: Cross-Sectional Study.评估中国TikTok上与肥厚性瘢痕相关视频的内容和质量:横断面研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Apr 29;5:e64792. doi: 10.2196/64792.
8
Evaluating the quality of TikTok videos on coronary artery disease using various scales to examine correlations with video characteristics and high-quality content.使用各种量表评估TikTok上关于冠状动脉疾病的视频质量,以检验与视频特征和高质量内容的相关性。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 17;15(1):9189. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93986-3.
9
Quality of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Videos Available on TikTok and Bilibili: Content Analysis.抖音和哔哩哔哩上胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤视频的质量:内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 11;8:e60033. doi: 10.2196/60033.
10
Comparative analysis of NAFLD-related health videos on TikTok: a cross-language study in the USA and China.TikTok上非酒精性脂肪性肝病相关健康视频的比较分析:美国和中国的跨语言研究
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 4;24(1):3375. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20851-9.
短视频应用作为慢性阻塞性肺疾病的健康信息来源:TikTok 视频的信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 20;23(12):e28318. doi: 10.2196/28318.
4
TikTok as a Health Information Source: Assessment of the Quality of Information in Diabetes-Related Videos.TikTok 作为健康信息来源:糖尿病相关视频信息质量评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 1;23(9):e30409. doi: 10.2196/30409.
5
Analyzing the Quality of Aesthetic Surgery Procedure Videos on TikTok.分析 TikTok 上美容手术流程视频的质量。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):2078-2083. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab291.
6
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
Quality of Bladder Cancer Information on YouTube.YouTube 膀胱癌信息质量
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):56-59. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.014. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
8
Are DISCERN and JAMA Suitable Instruments for Assessing YouTube Videos on Thyroid Cancer? Methodological Concerns.DISCERN 和 JAMA 是否适合评估关于甲状腺癌的 YouTube 视频?方法学问题。
J Cancer Educ. 2020 Dec;35(6):1267-1277. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01763-9.
9
Global trends in thyroid cancer incidence and the impact of overdiagnosis.甲状腺癌发病率的全球趋势及过度诊断的影响。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020 Jun;8(6):468-470. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30115-7.
10
Online health information-seeking behavior by endocrinology patients.内分泌科患者的在线健康信息搜索行为。
Hormones (Athens). 2019 Dec;18(4):495-505. doi: 10.1007/s42000-019-00159-9. Epub 2019 Nov 20.