Dusch H, Altwegg M
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Zürich, Switzerland.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Apr;33(4):802-4. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.4.802-804.1995.
A three-phase study was conducted to compare Hektoen enteric agar (HE), Rambach agar (Ra), SM-ID medium (SM), xylose-lysine-Tergitol 4 agar (XLT4), novobiocin-brilliant green-glycerol-lactose agar (NBGL), and modified semisolid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium (MSRV) for the recovery of nontyphoid salmonellae from stool specimens. After evaluation of the first two phases, which resulted in the elimination of Ra, SM, and NBGL, 593 consecutive stool samples were investigated by plating them directly and after tetrathionate enrichment at 37 degrees C on HE, XLT4, and MSRV. A total of 82 Salmonella-positive stool specimens were detected (positivity rate, 13.8%). Sensitivities for direct plating and after tetrathionate enrichment were 32.9 and 86.6%, respectively, for XLT4, 63.4 and 100.0%, respectively, for MSRV, and 34.1 and 79.3%, respectively, for HE. Specificities (percentage of morphologically suspicious colonies that were indeed salmonellae) were 100.0 and 99.8%, respectively, for XLT4, 99.0 and 98.8%, respectively, for MSRV, and 67.9 and 75.0%, respectively, for HE. The use of MSRV instead of HE increased the isolation rate of salmonellae by 26.2% (65 versus 82 strains isolated from HE and MSRV, respectively). We conclude that MSRV is the most sensitive medium tested and is a very specific medium for the isolation of nontyphoid salmonellae from stool specimens. However, its semisolid nature is a disadvantage and requires careful handling in the laboratory, especially when salmonellae are present. XLT4 had a sensitivity comparable to that of HE and a nearly 100% specificity and can be regarded as an alternative for the isolation of nontyphoid salmonellae from stool samples.
进行了一项三相研究,以比较赫克托恩肠杆菌琼脂(HE)、兰巴赫琼脂(Ra)、SM-ID培养基(SM)、木糖赖氨酸-特吉托4琼脂(XLT4)、新生霉素-亮绿-甘油-乳糖琼脂(NBGL)和改良半固体拉帕波特-瓦西利亚迪斯培养基(MSRV)从粪便标本中分离非伤寒沙门氏菌的效果。在前两个阶段的评估导致Ra、SM和NBGL被淘汰后,对593份连续的粪便样本进行了研究,将它们直接接种以及在37℃经四硫磺酸盐增菌后分别接种于HE、XLT4和MSRV上。总共检测到82份沙门氏菌阳性粪便标本(阳性率为13.8%)。对于XLT4,直接接种和经四硫磺酸盐增菌后的敏感性分别为32.9%和86.6%;对于MSRV,分别为63.4%和100.0%;对于HE,分别为34.1%和79.3%。特异性(形态学上可疑菌落确实为沙门氏菌的百分比)对于XLT4分别为100.0%和99.8%,对于MSRV分别为99.0%和98.8%,对于HE分别为67.9%和75.0%。使用MSRV而非HE使沙门氏菌的分离率提高了26.2%(分别从HE和MSRV分离出65株和82株)。我们得出结论,MSRV是所测试的最敏感的培养基,并且是从粪便标本中分离非伤寒沙门氏菌的非常特异的培养基。然而,其半固体性质是一个缺点,在实验室中需要小心处理,尤其是当存在沙门氏菌时。XLT4的敏感性与HE相当,特异性接近100%,可被视为从粪便样本中分离非伤寒沙门氏菌的替代方法。