Suppr超能文献

静态与动态24小时pH监测系统在胃食管反流病诊断中的比较。

Comparison of stationary vs ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring systems in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

作者信息

Grande L, Culell P, Ros E, Lacima G, Pujol A, García-Valdecasas J C, Fuster J, Visa J, Pera C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hospital Clinic i Provincial, University of Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 1993 Feb;38(2):213-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01307537.

Abstract

Twenty-four-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring is presently considered the most reliable diagnostic test for gastroesophageal reflux. Prolonged esophageal pH measurements can be obtained in hospitalized patients with a stationary technique and in ambulant outpatients by means of a portable device; however, there have been no studies that have examined whether the two approaches provide a similar diagnostic accuracy. We performed a prospective study to compare stationary and ambulatory pH-metry in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux. Seventy-seven control subjects and 178 patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease were randomized to either ambulant or static pH-metry, which was performed with standard pH electrodes, sensors, and recorders. Reflux events (intraesophageal pH < 4.0) analyzed were: number of episodes; total, upright, and supine reflux time; number of episodes lasting > 5 min; and duration of the longest episode. A composite score of all reflux events according to DeMeester was also calculated. The limits of normality were defined as the 95th percentiles of the control groups. Both controls and patients assigned to either pH monitoring method were comparable. Of 255 studies attempted, 243 (95%) were completed successfully. The results showed similar median values of reflux events for the two control groups and for the two patients groups. Percent total reflux time provided a good separation between normal and abnormal reflux, with a sensitivity of 0.92 for static pH-metry and 0.68 for the ambulant procedure (respective 95th percentiles, 3.4 and 4.6).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

目前,24小时食管pH监测被认为是诊断胃食管反流最可靠的检查方法。住院患者可采用固定技术进行长时间食管pH测量,门诊患者则可通过便携式设备进行测量;然而,尚无研究探讨这两种方法的诊断准确性是否相似。我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较固定和动态pH测量法在胃食管反流诊断中的应用。77名对照者和178名已确诊胃食管反流病的患者被随机分为动态或静态pH测量组,采用标准pH电极、传感器和记录仪进行测量。分析的反流事件(食管内pH < 4.0)包括:发作次数;总反流时间、直立位反流时间和仰卧位反流时间;持续时间> 5分钟的发作次数;最长发作的持续时间。还根据DeMeester法计算了所有反流事件的综合评分。正常范围定义为对照组的第95百分位数。接受两种pH监测方法的对照者和患者具有可比性。在尝试的255项研究中,243项(95%)成功完成。结果显示,两个对照组和两个患者组的反流事件中位数相似。总反流时间百分比在正常反流和异常反流之间有较好的区分度,静态pH测量法的敏感性为0.92,动态测量法为0.68(各自的第95百分位数分别为3.4和4.6)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验