• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

六种冲洗剂对主要牙髓病原菌抗菌活性的比较。

Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of six irrigants on primary endodontic pathogens.

作者信息

Carson Katherine R, Goodell Gary G, McClanahan Scott B

机构信息

Naval Postgraduate Dental School, Bethesda, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 2005 Jun;31(6):471-3. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000148868.72833.62.

DOI:10.1097/01.don.0000148868.72833.62
PMID:15917691
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the antimicrobial activities of 6% and 3% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 2% and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), and 0.01% and 0.005% doxycycline (Doxy) on four microorganisms associated with primary endodontic infections. The agar diffusion test was used to measure antimicrobial activities of these agents against Peptostreptococcus micros, Prevotella intermedia, Streptococcus sanguis, and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Minimum inhibitory concentration analysis was performed using the macrodilution method. For three of the four microorganisms, the general order of antimicrobial effectiveness was 0.01% Doxy >0.005% Doxy >6% NaOCl >3% NaOCl >2% CHX > 0.12% CHX. For L. acidophilus, the order of effectiveness was 6% NaOCl >3% NaOCl >2% CHX > 0.01% Doxy >0.005% Doxy >0.12% CHX. The 6% NaOCl showed significantly greater zones of inhibition than 3% NaOCl for all endopathogens tested.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较6%和3%的次氯酸钠(NaOCl)、2%和0.12%的葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)以及0.01%和0.005%的多西环素(强力霉素)对四种与原发性牙髓感染相关的微生物的抗菌活性。采用琼脂扩散试验来测定这些药物对微小消化链球菌、中间普雷沃菌、血链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌的抗菌活性。使用常量稀释法进行最低抑菌浓度分析。对于四种微生物中的三种,抗菌效力的一般顺序为0.01%强力霉素>0.005%强力霉素>6%次氯酸钠>3%次氯酸钠>2%葡萄糖酸氯己定>0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定。对于嗜酸乳杆菌,效力顺序为6%次氯酸钠>3%次氯酸钠>2%葡萄糖酸氯己定>0.01%强力霉素>0.005%强力霉素>0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定。对于所有测试的牙髓病原菌,6%的次氯酸钠显示出比3%次氯酸钠明显更大的抑菌圈。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of six irrigants on primary endodontic pathogens.六种冲洗剂对主要牙髓病原菌抗菌活性的比较。
J Endod. 2005 Jun;31(6):471-3. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000148868.72833.62.
2
A comparative antimicrobial analysis of various root canal irrigating solutions on endodontic pathogens: an in vitro study.不同根管冲洗液对牙髓病病原体的抗菌效果比较分析:一项体外研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Mar 1;15(2):153-60. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1506.
3
In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite.洗必泰和次氯酸钠抗菌活性的体外评估
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Jan;97(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/s1079-2104(03)00360-3.
4
Antimicrobial effect of MTAD, Tetraclean, Cloreximid, and sodium hypochlorite on three common endodontic pathogens.MTAD、Tetraclean、Cloreximid和次氯酸钠对三种常见牙髓病病原体的抗菌作用。
Indian J Dent Res. 2009 Jul-Sep;20(3):391. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.57353.
5
Comparative study of the antimicrobial efficacy of chlorhexidine gel, chlorhexidine solution and sodium hypochlorite as endodontic irrigants.洗必泰凝胶、洗必泰溶液和次氯酸钠作为根管冲洗剂的抗菌效果比较研究。
Braz Dent J. 2007;18(4):294-8. doi: 10.1590/s0103-64402007000400004.
6
Evaluation of the antimicrobial activities of chlorhexidine gluconate, sodium hypochlorite and octenidine hydrochloride in vitro.葡萄糖酸氯己定、次氯酸钠和盐酸奥替尼啶的体外抗菌活性评估。
Aust Endod J. 2013 Apr;39(1):15-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00266.x. Epub 2010 Oct 24.
7
Antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine by two different tests.通过两种不同测试评估次氯酸钠和洗必泰的抗菌活性。
Aust Endod J. 2008 Apr;34(1):19-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2007.00071.x.
8
Antimicrobial and toxic effects of established and potential root canal irrigants.已确定的和潜在的根管冲洗剂的抗菌及毒性作用
J Endod. 1995 Oct;21(10):513-5. doi: 10.1016/s0099-2399(06)80524-8.
9
In vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against selected single-species biofilms.次氯酸钠和洗必泰对选定单菌种生物膜的体外抗菌活性。
Int Endod J. 2006 Nov;39(11):878-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01161.x.
10
An in vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of irrigants on biofilms of root canal isolates.根管分离株生物膜上冲洗剂抗菌效果的体外评估
Int Endod J. 2001 Jun;34(4):300-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00392.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of the Influence of Various Concentrations of Sodium Hypochlorite on Stem Cell Derived From Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth (SHED) Proliferation and Differentiation.评估不同浓度次氯酸钠对人脱落乳牙干细胞(SHED)增殖和分化的影响。
Cureus. 2022 Dec 27;14(12):e33024. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33024. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Efficacy of Ozone to Eliminate Endopathogenic Microorganism in Rootcanal Biofilm.臭氧消除根管生物膜内源性微生物的疗效
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2022 Jul;14(Suppl 1):S876-S879. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_916_21. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
3
Antibacterial efficacy of peracetic acid in comparison with sodium hypochlorite or chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis and Parvimonas micra.
过氧乙酸与次氯酸钠或洗必泰相比对粪肠球菌和小韦荣球菌的抗菌效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Apr 9;22(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02148-8.
4
Antibacterial effect of silver diamine fluoride and potassium iodide against E. faecalis, A. naeslundii and P. micra.银氨氟化物和碘化钾对粪肠球菌、奈瑟菌和微小消化链球菌的抗菌效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Apr 7;21(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01531-1.
5
effect of XP-Endo finisher on the amount of residual debris and smear layer on the root canal walls.XP根管锉对根管壁上残余碎屑和玷污层数量的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 May-Jun;16(3):179-184.
6
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Nanosilver Solution, Sodium Hypochlorite and Normal Saline in Root Canal Irrigation of Primary Teeth.纳米银溶液、次氯酸钠和生理盐水在乳牙根管冲洗中抗菌效果的评估
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S227-S232. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_95_18.
7
Smear layer removal evaluation of different protocol of Bio Race file and XP- endo Finisher file in corporation with EDTA 17% and NaOCl.使用17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)和次氯酸钠(NaOCl)联合不同方案的Bio Race锉和XP-endo Finisher锉去除玷污层的评估
J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Nov 1;9(11):e1310-e1314. doi: 10.4317/jced.54179. eCollection 2017 Nov.
8
Root Canal Irrigation: Chemical Agents and Plant Extracts Against .根管冲洗:对抗……的化学药剂和植物提取物
Open Dent J. 2016 Dec 19;10:692-703. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010692. eCollection 2016.
9
Effectiveness of XP-endo Finisher, EndoActivator, and File agitation on debris and smear layer removal in curved root canals: a comparative study.XP-endo Finisher、EndoActivator和锉动法在弯曲根管中清除碎屑和玷污层的效果:一项对比研究。
Odontology. 2017 Apr;105(2):178-183. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0251-8. Epub 2016 May 20.
10
Comparative antimicrobial efficacy of herbal alternatives (Emblica officinalis, Psidium guajava), MTAD, and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite against Enterococcus faecalis: An in vitro study.草药替代品(余甘子、番石榴)、MTAD和2.5%次氯酸钠对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果比较:一项体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016 Jan-Apr;6(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.12.010. Epub 2016 Jan 20.