Suppr超能文献

在确定狼疮患者的血栓形成亚组方面,凝血筛查比抗心磷脂抗体酶联免疫吸附测定更具特异性。

Coagulation screen is more specific than the anticardiolipin antibody ELISA in defining a thrombotic subset of lupus patients.

作者信息

Derksen R H, Hasselaar P, Blokzijl L, Gmelig Meyling F H, De Groot P G

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine (Division of Immunopathology), University Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 1988 May;47(5):364-71. doi: 10.1136/ard.47.5.364.

Abstract

In 111 lupus patients we compared the potential of the IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibody (ACA) enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and four different lupus anticoagulant (LAC) assays (partial thromboplastin time (PTT) of a 1:1 mixture of patient and control plasma with phospholipids from animal (PTT-st) or human brain (PTT-HB); PTT with dilutions of human brain phospholipids (PL dilution); and kaolin clotting time of mixtures of patient and control plasma (KCT] to identify patients with thrombosis (26/111), fetal loss (19/46), and/or thrombocytopenia (11/106). The highest specificity for thrombosis (87%) was found with PTT-HB and PL dilution (sensitivity 65%, detection rate 61%); for fetal loss (93%) with PL dilution (sensitivity 47%; detection rate 82%), and for thrombocytopenia (83%) with KCT (sensitivity 82%; detection rate 36%). Compared with LAC assays, the sensitivity of ACA-ELISA was high (greater than or equal to 77%), but specificity (less than or equal to 51%) and detection rate (less than or equal to 52%) were low. So, a panel of three LAC assays (PTT-HB, PL dilution, and KCT) can identify lupus patients apparently at risk for thrombosis, fetal loss, and/or thrombocytopenia, whereas the ACA-ELISA is insufficiently specific.

摘要

我们对111例狼疮患者进行了研究,比较了IgG和IgM抗心磷脂抗体(ACA)酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)以及四种不同的狼疮抗凝物(LAC)测定方法(患者血浆与动物来源磷脂(PTT-st)或人脑磷脂(PTT-HB)按1:1混合后的部分凝血活酶时间(PTT);用人脑磷脂稀释液进行的PTT(PL稀释);以及患者血浆与对照血浆混合物的高岭土凝血时间(KCT)),以识别患有血栓形成(26/111)、胎儿丢失(19/46)和/或血小板减少症(11/106)的患者。PTT-HB和PL稀释法对血栓形成的特异性最高(87%)(敏感性65%,检出率61%);PL稀释法对胎儿丢失的特异性最高(93%)(敏感性47%;检出率82%),KCT对血小板减少症的特异性最高(83%)(敏感性82%;检出率36%)。与LAC测定方法相比,ACA-ELISA的敏感性较高(大于或等于77%),但特异性(小于或等于51%)和检出率(小于或等于52%)较低。因此,一组三种LAC测定方法(PTT-HB, PL稀释和KCT)可以识别明显有血栓形成、胎儿丢失和/或血小板减少症风险的狼疮患者,而ACA-ELISA的特异性不足。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Antiphospholipid antibodies: paradigm in transition.抗磷脂抗体:处于转变中的范例。
J Neuroinflammation. 2009 Jan 20;6:3. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-6-3.
7
Antiphospholipid syndrome: multiple mechanisms.抗磷脂综合征:多种机制
Clin Exp Immunol. 2004 Jun;136(3):393-401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2004.02497.x.

本文引用的文献

3
Thrombosis in patients with the lupus anticoagulant.狼疮抗凝物患者的血栓形成
Ann Intern Med. 1980 Feb;92(2 Pt 1):156-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-92-2-156.
6
Lupus anticoagulants.狼疮抗凝物
Prog Hemost Thromb. 1982;6:263-85.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验