Suppr超能文献

南非 50 岁及以上成年人多维贫困与痴呆的关系。

Association of Multidimensional Poverty With Dementia in Adults Aged 50 Years or Older in South Africa.

机构信息

Brown School, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri.

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e224160. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.4160.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Limited research exists investigating the association between multidimensional poverty and dementia in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between multidimensional poverty and dementia among adults aged 50 years or older living in South Africa.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Soweto, Johannesburg, South Africa, between November 11, 2019, and February 28, 2020. Participants included 227 adults aged 50 years or older. Data analysis was concluded from August 1 to 30, 2021.

EXPOSURES

Multidimensional poverty included 7 dimensions that are central to well-being (education, health, economic activity, living standards, social participation, fair treatment, and psychological well-being) and 11 indicators of deprivation within those dimensions (limited access to education; severe limitation of activity; difficulty functioning; unemployment; deprivation of access to running water, electricity, and a flush toilet; lack of involvement in community groups; discrimination; depression; and decreased self-esteem).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The 8-item Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia (Assessing Dementia 8 [AD8]) and the Rowland Universal Dementia Assessment Scale (RUDAS) were used to assess dementia. Level and depth of poverty were compared between adults with no dementia and those with a score above the threshold for either the AD8 or the RUDAS, or for both the AD8 and the RUDAS, adjusting for gender, age group, and marital status. Correlation analyses assessed the overlap of dimensions of deprivation. Associations between dementia and multidimensional poverty were investigated using a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 227 adults (146 women [64.3%]; mean [SD] age, 63.7 [0.5] years) were included in the study; 101 (44.5%) had dementia identified by the AD8, 14 (6.2%) had dementia identified by the RUDAS, and 50 (22.0%) had dementia identified by both the AD8 and the RUDAS. More men than women did not have dementia (26 of 81 [32.1%] vs 36 of 146 [24.7%]), and 33 of 165 adults with dementia (20.0%) compared with 6 of 62 adults (9.7%) without dementia were found to be deprived in 4 dimensions or more. The difference between adults with and adults without dementia in the Multidimensional Poverty Index for deprivation in 4 dimensions was 145.8% for dementia identified by both the AD8 and the RUDAS and 118.2% for dementia identified by either the AD8 or the RUDAS. Education, health, and employment were the main contributors to the adjusted poverty head count ratio. Multidimensional poverty was strongly associated with dementia as measured by the AD8 and the RUDAS (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.08-4.95), with higher odds for older women (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.00-4.12) or those living in large households (for each additional household member: OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05-1.53).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that the prevalence and depth of poverty were higher among adults with dementia. A lack of education, poor health, and unemployment were major dimensions of poverty that were associated with a higher prevalence of dementia. Long-term interventions beginning early in life may affect social determinants of health through targeted structural policies (eg, access to quality education and health care) and prevent dementia later in life.

摘要

重要性:关于中低收入国家(LMICs)多维贫困与痴呆症之间的关联,研究甚少。

目的:调查南非 50 岁及以上成年人中多维贫困与痴呆症之间的关联。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项横断面研究,于 2019 年 11 月 11 日至 2020 年 2 月 28 日在南非约翰内斯堡索韦托进行。参与者包括 227 名 50 岁及以上的成年人。数据分析于 2021 年 8 月 1 日至 30 日结束。

暴露因素:多维贫困包括对福祉至关重要的 7 个维度(教育、健康、经济活动、生活水平、社会参与、公平待遇和心理健康)和这 7 个维度中 11 个贫困指标(教育机会有限;活动严重受限;功能障碍;失业;缺乏自来水、电和冲水厕所的使用机会;缺乏参与社区团体;歧视;抑郁;自尊心下降)。

主要结果和措施:使用 8 项访谈区分衰老和痴呆症(评估痴呆症 8 [AD8])和罗兰通用痴呆症评估量表(RUDAS)来评估痴呆症。在没有痴呆症的成年人和 AD8 或 RUDAS 得分超过阈值的成年人之间,或在 AD8 和 RUDAS 都得分超过阈值的成年人之间,比较了贫困的水平和深度,并调整了性别、年龄组和婚姻状况。相关性分析评估了贫困维度的重叠程度。使用多变量逻辑回归模型研究痴呆症与多维贫困之间的关联。

结果:共纳入 227 名成年人(146 名女性[64.3%];平均[标准差]年龄 63.7[0.5]岁);101 名(44.5%)通过 AD8 确诊为痴呆症,14 名(6.2%)通过 RUDAS 确诊为痴呆症,50 名(22.0%)通过 AD8 和 RUDAS 同时确诊为痴呆症。与女性相比,更多的男性没有痴呆症(81 名中的 26 名[32.1%]与 146 名中的 36 名[24.7%]),与没有痴呆症的 62 名成年人相比,有 33 名(20.0%)患有痴呆症的成年人在 4 个及以上维度中处于贫困状态。通过 AD8 和 RUDAS 同时诊断为痴呆症的成年人与没有痴呆症的成年人在多维贫困指数方面的差异为 145.8%,通过 AD8 或 RUDAS 诊断为痴呆症的成年人与没有痴呆症的成年人在多维贫困指数方面的差异为 118.2%。教育、健康和就业是调整后贫困人数比例的主要贡献因素。多维贫困与 AD8 和 RUDAS 测量的痴呆症密切相关(调整后的优势比[OR],2.31;95%置信区间[CI],1.08-4.95),年龄较大的女性(OR,2.03;95%CI,1.00-4.12)或居住在大家庭中的女性(每增加一个家庭成员:OR,1.27;95%CI,1.05-1.53)发生痴呆症的风险更高。

结论和相关性:本研究表明,痴呆症患者的贫困发生率和深度更高。缺乏教育、健康状况不佳和失业是贫困的主要方面,与更高的痴呆症患病率相关。从生命早期开始的长期干预措施可能会通过有针对性的结构性政策(例如,获得优质教育和医疗保健)影响健康的社会决定因素,并预防生命后期的痴呆症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e53/8956981/aa5bce5e0f2d/jamanetwopen-e224160-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验