Suppr超能文献

临床微生物学实验室五种庆大霉素检测方法的评估

Evaluation of five gentamicin assay procedures for clinical microbiology laboratories.

作者信息

Selepak S T, Witebsky F G, Robertson E A, MacLowry J D

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1981 Apr;13(4):742-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.13.4.742-749.1981.

Abstract

Five gentamicin assay procedures (a bioassay, an enzyme immunoassay, a latex agglutination inhibition test, a fluorescence immunoassay, and a radioimmunoassay) were evaluated to determine which was optimal for our laboratory. The evaluation was based on recovery and precision studies and results of analyses of patient samples, as well as technical assay performance factors. The latex agglutination inhibition test appears useful for laboratories performing only occasional assays for gentamicin; however, the fact that some rheumatoid factor-positive sera, as well as some other sera for unknown reasons, may give falsely low values is a potential drawback to this procedure. Because of its accuracy, precision, rapid turn-around time, and relative simplicity of performance, we selected the enzyme immunoassay procedure for routine use for gentamicin assays in our laboratory.

摘要

对五种庆大霉素检测方法(一种生物测定法、一种酶免疫测定法、一种乳胶凝集抑制试验、一种荧光免疫测定法和一种放射免疫测定法)进行了评估,以确定哪种方法最适合我们实验室。评估基于回收率和精密度研究、患者样本分析结果以及检测方法的技术性能因素。乳胶凝集抑制试验对于仅偶尔进行庆大霉素检测的实验室似乎有用;然而,一些类风湿因子阳性血清以及其他一些血清可能会因不明原因给出错误的低值,这是该方法的一个潜在缺点。由于其准确性、精密度、快速周转时间以及操作相对简单,我们选择酶免疫测定法作为我们实验室常规进行庆大霉素检测的方法。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验