Henriksen J E, Djurhuus M S, Vaag A, Thye-Rønn P, Knudsen D, Hother-Nielsen O, Beck-Nielsen H
Diabetes Research Centre, Odense University, Denmark.
Diabetologia. 1993 Aug;36(8):752-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00401147.
The absorption rate of rapid acting (soluble) insulin is slow from the subcutaneous tissue of the thigh compared to intramuscular injection into the thigh and s.c. injection into the abdominal wall. The aim of the study was to evaluate the impact of soluble insulin injected either intramuscularly into the thigh (IMT), s.c. into the abdominal wall (SCA) or s.c. into the thigh (SCT) on glycaemic control in Type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic outpatients treated with the basal bolus insulin delivery regimen. Fifty-five, C-peptide negative Type 1 diabetic outpatients were included in a randomised 3-month intervention study. The insulin doses were adjusted frequently by blinded observers based on the patients' self-monitored blood glucose values and reported hypoglycaemic episodes. The serum fructosamine value was within normal limits in three patients in the IMT group, in six patients in the SCA group and in none of the patients in the SCT group following the intervention period (p < 0.01). However, the difference in mean serum fructosamine values did not reach statistical significance (IMT: 1.24 mmol/l (95% confidence interval; 1.17 to 1.31), SCA: 1.25 mmol/l (1.18 to 1.32), SCT: 1.34 mmol/l (1.26 to 1.41), (p = 0.09). Blood glucose excursions were larger in the SCT group than in the SCA and IMT group from post-lunch to pre-dinner measurements and from pre- to post-dinner measurements. A higher number of measured low nocturnal blood glucose values (less than 4 mmol/l) was observed in the SCT group (34 of 85) than in the IMT (14 of 64) and SCA (21 of 81) group (p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
与大腿肌肉注射及腹壁皮下注射相比,快速起效(可溶性)胰岛素从大腿皮下组织的吸收速率较慢。本研究的目的是评估在接受基础-餐时胰岛素给药方案治疗的1型(胰岛素依赖型)糖尿病门诊患者中,分别进行大腿肌肉注射(IMT)、腹壁皮下注射(SCA)或大腿皮下注射(SCT)可溶性胰岛素对血糖控制的影响。55名C肽阴性的1型糖尿病门诊患者被纳入一项为期3个月的随机干预研究。胰岛素剂量由盲法观察者根据患者自我监测的血糖值和报告的低血糖发作情况频繁调整。干预期后,IMT组有3名患者、SCA组有6名患者的血清果糖胺值在正常范围内,而SCT组无一例患者的血清果糖胺值在正常范围内(p<0.01)。然而,平均血清果糖胺值的差异未达到统计学意义(IMT:1.24 mmol/L(95%置信区间:1.17至1.31),SCA:1.25 mmol/L(1.18至1.32),SCT:1.34 mmol/L(1.26至1.41),(p = 0.09)。从午餐后到晚餐前测量以及晚餐前到晚餐后测量,SCT组的血糖波动大于SCA组和IMT组。SCT组(85例中有34例)夜间测得的低血糖值(低于4 mmol/L)数量高于IMT组(64例中有14例)和SCA组(81例中有21例)(p<0.05)。(摘要截选至250字)