Suppr超能文献

FUNGITEST与肉汤微量稀释法对念珠菌属和新型隐球菌进行抗真菌药敏试验的比较评估。

Comparative evaluation of FUNGITEST and broth microdilution methods for antifungal drug susceptibility testing of Candida species and Cryptococcus neoformans.

作者信息

Davey K G, Holmes A D, Johnson E M, Szekely A, Warnock D W

机构信息

Mycology Reference Laboratory, Public Health Laboratory Service, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 1998 Apr;36(4):926-30. doi: 10.1128/JCM.36.4.926-930.1998.

Abstract

The FUNGITEST method (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur, Paris, France) is a microplate-based procedure for the breakpoint testing of six antifungal agents (amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole, and miconazole). We compared the FUNGITEST method with a broth microdilution test, performed according to National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards document M27-A guidelines, for determining the in vitro susceptibilities of 180 isolates of Candida spp. (50 C. albicans, 50 C. glabrata, 10 C. kefyr, 20 C. krusei, 10 C. lusitaniae, 20 C. parapsilosis, and 20 C. tropicalis isolates) and 20 isolates of Cryptococcus neoformans. Overall, there was 100% agreement between the methods for amphotericin B, 95% agreement for flucytosine, 84% agreement for miconazole, 83% agreement for itraconazole, 77% agreement for ketoconazole, and 76% agreement for fluconazole. The overall agreement between the methods exceeded 80% for all species tested with the exception of C. glabrata (71% agreement). The poorest agreement between the results for individual agents was seen with C. glabrata (38% for fluconazole, 44% for ketoconazole, and 56% for itraconazole) and C. tropicalis (50% for miconazole). The FUNGITEST method misclassified as susceptible 2 of 12 (16.6%) fluconazole-resistant isolates, 2 of 10 (20%) itraconazole-resistant isolates, and 4 of 8 (50%) ketoconazole-resistant isolates of several Candida spp. Further development of the FUNGITEST procedure will be required before it can be recommended as an alternative method for the susceptibility testing of Candida spp. or C. neoformans.

摘要

FUNGITEST方法(赛诺菲巴斯德诊断公司,法国巴黎)是一种基于微孔板的程序,用于六种抗真菌药物(两性霉素B、氟胞嘧啶、氟康唑、伊曲康唑、酮康唑和咪康唑)的折点检测。我们将FUNGITEST方法与肉汤微量稀释试验进行了比较,肉汤微量稀释试验是根据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会M27-A指南进行的,用于确定180株念珠菌属菌株(50株白色念珠菌、50株光滑念珠菌、10株克柔念珠菌、20株克鲁斯念珠菌、10株葡萄牙念珠菌、20株近平滑念珠菌和20株热带念珠菌)和20株新型隐球菌的体外药敏性。总体而言,两性霉素B的两种方法之间的一致性为100%,氟胞嘧啶为95%,咪康唑为84%,伊曲康唑为83%,酮康唑为77%,氟康唑为76%。除光滑念珠菌(一致性为71%)外,所有测试菌种的两种方法之间的总体一致性均超过80%。个别药物结果之间一致性最差的是光滑念珠菌(氟康唑为38%,酮康唑为44%,伊曲康唑为56%)和热带念珠菌(咪康唑为50%)。FUNGITEST方法将几种念珠菌属的12株氟康唑耐药菌株中的2株(16.6%)、10株伊曲康唑耐药菌株中的2株(20%)和8株酮康唑耐药菌株中的4株(50%)错误分类为敏感。在FUNGITEST程序能够被推荐作为念珠菌属或新型隐球菌药敏试验的替代方法之前,还需要进一步改进。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
David and Goliath: chemical perturbation of eukaryotes by bacteria.大卫与歌利亚:细菌对真核生物的化学干扰
J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Mar;43(2-3):233-48. doi: 10.1007/s10295-015-1686-6. Epub 2015 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验