Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 105 Smith Level Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-8180, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2010 Apr;40(4):425-36. doi: 10.1007/s10803-009-0825-1. Epub 2009 Jul 25.
Multiple dimensions of comprehensive treatment models (CTMs) for learners with autism were evaluated in this study. The purpose of the study was to provide evaluative information upon which service providers, family members, and researchers could make decisions about model adoption, selection for a family member, or future research. Thirty CTMs were identified, with the majority based on an applied behavior analysis framework, although a substantial minority followed a developmental or relationship-based model. As a group, CTMs were strongest in the operationalization of their models, although relatively weaker in measurement of implementation, and with notable exceptions, weak in evidence of efficacy.
本研究评估了自闭症学习者的综合治疗模式(CTM)的多个维度。研究的目的是为服务提供者、家庭成员和研究人员提供有关模型采用、为家庭成员选择或未来研究的决策依据的评估信息。确定了 30 种 CTM,其中大多数基于应用行为分析框架,尽管少数基于发展或关系模型。作为一个整体,CTM 在其模型的实施方面最强,尽管在实施的测量方面相对较弱,并且除了显著的例外情况外,在疗效方面的证据也较弱。