• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估印度南部一项基于学校的安全用水干预措施对家庭采用家庭用水处理方法的影响。

Assessing the impact of a school-based safe water intervention on household adoption of point-of-use water treatment practices in southern India.

作者信息

Freeman Matthew C, Clasen Thomas

机构信息

Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Mar;84(3):370-8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0361.

DOI:10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0361
PMID:21363972
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3042810/
Abstract

We assessed a pilot project by UNICEF and Hindustan Unilever Limited to improve the quality of drinking water for children in schools through adoption of improved drinking water practices among households in southern India. The intervention consisted of providing classrooms of 200 schools a commercial water purifier, and providing basic hygiene and water treatment information to students, parents, and teachers. We found no evidence that the intervention was effective in improving awareness or uptake of effective water treatment practices at home. A similar proportion of household members in the intervention and control groups boiled their water (P = 0.60), used a ceramic filtration system (P = 0.33), and used a cloth filter (P = 0.89). One year after the launch of the campaign, household ownership of the commercial purifier promoted at schools was higher in the intervention group (26%) than the control group (19%), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.53).

摘要

我们评估了联合国儿童基金会和印度斯坦联合利华有限公司开展的一个试点项目,该项目旨在通过在印度南部家庭中采用改进的饮用水处理方式,提高学校儿童的饮用水质量。干预措施包括为200所学校的教室配备商用净水器,并向学生、家长和教师提供基本的卫生和水处理信息。我们没有发现证据表明该干预措施能有效提高家庭对有效水处理方式的认知或采用率。干预组和对照组中采用烧水方式的家庭成员比例相似(P = 0.60),使用陶瓷过滤系统的比例相似(P = 0.33),使用布质过滤器的比例也相似(P = 0.89)。活动开展一年后,干预组中学校推广的商用净水器的家庭拥有率(26%)高于对照组(19%),但这一差异无统计学意义(P = 0.53)。

相似文献

1
Assessing the impact of a school-based safe water intervention on household adoption of point-of-use water treatment practices in southern India.评估印度南部一项基于学校的安全用水干预措施对家庭采用家庭用水处理方法的影响。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2011 Mar;84(3):370-8. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2011.10-0361.
2
Promoting household water treatment through women's self help groups in Rural India: assessing impact on drinking water quality and equity.在印度农村通过妇女自助团体促进家庭水处理:评估对饮用水质量和公平性的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044068. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
3
Local drinking water filters reduce diarrheal disease in Cambodia: a randomized, controlled trial of the ceramic water purifier.当地饮用水过滤器可减少柬埔寨的腹泻病:陶瓷净水器的一项随机对照试验
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008 Sep;79(3):394-400.
4
Microbiological performance of common water treatment devices for household use in India.印度家用常见水处理设备的微生物性能
Int J Environ Health Res. 2007 Apr;17(2):83-93. doi: 10.1080/09603120701217695.
5
Perception of drinking water safety and factors influencing acceptance and sustainability of a water quality intervention in rural southern India.印度南部农村地区饮用水安全认知以及影响水质干预措施接受度与可持续性的因素
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;15:731. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1974-0.
6
Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea.改善水质以预防腹泻的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 20;2015(10):CD004794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004794.pub3.
7
Protocol for a cluster randomised stepped wedge trial assessing the impact of a community-level hygiene intervention and a water intervention using riverbank filtration technology on diarrhoeal prevalence in India.一项整群随机阶梯楔形试验的方案,该试验评估社区层面的卫生干预措施以及采用河岸过滤技术的水干预措施对印度腹泻患病率的影响。
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 17;7(3):e015036. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015036.
8
Is fecal contamination of drinking water after collection associated with household water handling and hygiene practices? A study of urban slum households in Hyderabad, India.饮用水采集后受到粪便污染是否与家庭用水处理及卫生习惯有关?印度海得拉巴市城市贫民窟家庭研究。
J Water Health. 2009 Mar;7(1):145-54. doi: 10.2166/wh.2009.094.
9
The effect of water quality testing on household behavior: evidence from an experiment in rural India.水质检测对家庭行为的影响:来自印度农村的实验证据。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Jul;87(1):18-22. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0051.
10
Safety of packaged water distribution limited by household recontamination in rural Cambodia.包装水在柬埔寨农村的分销安全性受到家庭再污染的限制。
J Water Health. 2014 Jun;12(2):343-7. doi: 10.2166/wh.2013.118.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of household water, sanitation, and hygiene on early childhood education enrollment: evidence from the 2022 Bangladesh demographic and health survey.家庭用水、环境卫生和个人卫生对幼儿教育入学率的影响:来自2022年孟加拉国人口与健康调查的证据
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):2732. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23968-7.
2
Impact of water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) interventions on gender-specific school attendance and learning outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.水、环境卫生与个人卫生(WASH)干预措施对特定性别的学校出勤率和学习成果的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 1;19(8):e0308144. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308144. eCollection 2024.
3
Interventions promoting uptake of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) technologies in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies.促进低收入和中等收入国家采用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)技术的干预措施:有效性研究的证据与差距图
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 8;17(4):e1194. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1194. eCollection 2021 Dec.
4
The potential of school-based WASH programming to support children as agents of change in rural Zambian households.基于学校的 WASH 项目在支持赞比亚农村家庭儿童成为变革推动者方面的潜力。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Oct 8;21(1):1812. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11824-3.
5
Kenyan school book knowledge for water, sanitation, hygiene and health education interventions: Disconnect, integration or opportunities?肯尼亚学校教材中的水、环境卫生和个人卫生教育干预措施:脱节、整合还是机遇?
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2021 Jun;235:113756. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2021.113756. Epub 2021 May 15.
6
Regional Analysis of Associations between Infant and Young Child Feeding Practices and Diarrhoea in Indian Children.印度儿童喂养方式与腹泻之间关联的区域性分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 1;17(13):4740. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17134740.
7
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) in Schools in Low-Income Countries: A Review of Evidence of Impact.低收入国家学校水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH):影响证据综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 28;16(3):359. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030359.
8
Intervention strategies to reduce the burden of soil-transmitted helminths in India.减少印度土壤传播性蠕虫负担的干预策略。
Indian J Med Res. 2018 Jun;147(6):533-544. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_881_18.
9
Drinking water and rural schools in the Western Amazon: an environmental intervention study.亚马逊西部的饮用水与农村学校:一项环境干预研究。
PeerJ. 2018 Jun 15;6:e4993. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4993. eCollection 2018.
10
Effects of Boiling Drinking Water on Diarrhea and Pathogen-Specific Infections in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.煮沸饮用水对低收入和中等收入国家腹泻及特定病原体感染的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Nov;97(5):1362-1377. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0190. Epub 2017 Oct 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the role of school children in the promotion of point-of-use water treatment and handwashing in schools and households--Nyanza Province, Western Kenya, 2007.评价在校学生在学校和家庭中推广即时用水处理和洗手的作用--肯尼亚西部 Nyanza 省,2007 年。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010 Apr;82(4):664-71. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0422.
2
Household water treatment in developing countries: comparing different intervention types using meta-regression.发展中国家的家庭水处理:使用荟萃回归比较不同干预类型。
Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Dec 1;43(23):8991-7. doi: 10.1021/es9028217.
3
Increasing equity of access to point-of-use water treatment products through social marketing and entrepreneurship: a case study in western Kenya.通过社会营销和创业精神提高使用点水处理产品的获取公平性:肯尼亚西部的一个案例研究
J Water Health. 2009 Sep;7(3):527-34. doi: 10.2166/wh.2009.063.
4
Estimating child mortality due to diarrhoea in developing countries.估算发展中国家因腹泻导致的儿童死亡率。
Bull World Health Organ. 2008 Sep;86(9):710-7. doi: 10.2471/blt.07.050054.
5
The impact of the environment on health by country: a meta-synthesis.各国环境对健康的影响:一项元综合分析
Environ Health. 2008 Feb 25;7:7. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-7.
6
Socio-economic differences in health, nutrition, and population within developing countries: an overview.发展中国家内健康、营养和人口方面的社会经济差异:概述
Niger J Clin Pract. 2007 Dec;10(4):272-82.
7
Water handling, sanitation and defecation practices in rural southern India: a knowledge, attitudes and practices study.印度南部农村地区的用水、卫生设施及排便习惯:一项知识、态度和行为研究
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Nov;101(11):1124-30. doi: 10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Aug 31.
8
A cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of a handwashing-promotion program in Chinese primary schools.一项评估在中国小学开展的洗手促进项目效果的整群随机对照试验。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Jun;76(6):1166-73.
9
Behavioral indicators of household decision-making and demand for sanitation and potential gains from social marketing in Ghana.加纳家庭决策、卫生设施需求的行为指标以及社会营销的潜在收益
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Jun;64(12):2427-42. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.010. Epub 2007 Apr 17.
10
Interventions to improve water quality for preventing diarrhoea: systematic review and meta-analysis.改善水质以预防腹泻的干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMJ. 2007 Apr 14;334(7597):782. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39118.489931.BE. Epub 2007 Mar 12.