Department of Pharmacology, Center for Pharmacogenomics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Mar;113(3):541-556. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2818. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
Over the past few decades, genomewide association studies (GWASs) have identified the specific genetics variants contributing to many complex diseases by testing millions of genetic variations across the human genome against a variety of phenotypes. However, GWASs are limited in their ability to uncover mechanistic insight given that most significant associations are found in non-coding region of the genome. Furthermore, the lack of diversity in studies has stymied the advance of precision medicine for many historically excluded populations. In this review, we summarize most popular multi-omics approaches (genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) related to precision medicine and highlight if diverse populations have been included and how their findings have advance biological understanding of disease and drug response. New methods that incorporate local ancestry have been to improve the power of GWASs for admixed populations (such as African Americans and Latinx). Because most signals from GWAS are in the non-coding region, other machine learning and omics approaches have been developed to identify the potential causative single-nucleotide polymorphisms and genes that explain these phenotypes. These include polygenic risk scores, expression quantitative trait locus mapping, and transcriptome-wide association studies. Analogous protein methods, such as proteins quantitative trait locus mapping, proteome-wide association studies, and metabolomic approaches provide insight into the consequences of genetic variation on protein abundance. Whereas, integrated multi-omics studies have improved our understanding of the mechanisms for genetic association, we still lack the datasets and cohorts for historically excluded populations to provide equity in precision medicine and pharmacogenomics.
在过去的几十年中,全基因组关联研究(GWAS)通过测试人类基因组中数以百万计的遗传变异与各种表型的相关性,鉴定出了导致许多复杂疾病的特定遗传变异。然而,GWAS 在揭示机制见解方面的能力有限,因为大多数显著的关联都存在于基因组的非编码区域。此外,研究中缺乏多样性,阻碍了许多历史上被排除在外的人群的精准医学的发展。在这篇综述中,我们总结了与精准医学相关的最流行的多组学方法(基因组学、转录组学、蛋白质组学和代谢组学),并强调是否包括了多样化的人群,以及他们的发现如何推进了对疾病和药物反应的生物学理解。新的方法,如纳入本地祖先,已经被用来提高混合人群(如非裔美国人和拉丁裔)GWAS 的效力。由于大多数 GWAS 信号都在非编码区域,因此已经开发了其他机器学习和组学方法来识别潜在的致病单核苷酸多态性和基因,以解释这些表型。这些方法包括多基因风险评分、表达数量性状基因座映射和全转录组关联研究。类似的蛋白质方法,如蛋白质数量性状基因座映射、蛋白质组学全关联研究和代谢组学方法,提供了遗传变异对蛋白质丰度影响的见解。然而,综合多组学研究提高了我们对遗传关联机制的理解,我们仍然缺乏历史上被排除在外的人群的数据集和队列,以实现精准医学和药物基因组学的公平性。