Haimovich Julian S, Diamant Nate, Khurshid Shaan, Di Achille Paolo, Reeder Christopher, Friedman Sam, Singh Pulkit, Spurlock Walter, Ellinor Patrick T, Philippakis Anthony, Batra Puneet, Ho Jennifer E, Lubitz Steven A
Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2023 Mar 7;4(2):48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2023.03.001. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Differentiating among cardiac diseases associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) informs diagnosis and clinical care.
To evaluate if artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) facilitates automated detection and classification of LVH.
We used a pretrained convolutional neural network to derive numerical representations of 12-lead ECG waveforms from patients in a multi-institutional healthcare system who had cardiac diseases associated with LVH (n = 50,709), including cardiac amyloidosis (n = 304), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n = 1056), hypertension (n = 20,802), aortic stenosis (n = 446), and other causes (n = 4766). We then regressed LVH etiologies relative to no LVH on age, sex, and the numerical 12-lead representations using logistic regression ("LVH-Net"). To assess deep learning model performance on single-lead data analogous to mobile ECGs, we also developed 2 single-lead deep learning models by training models on lead I ("LVH-Net Lead I") or lead II ("LVH-Net Lead II") from the 12-lead ECG. We compared the performance of the LVH-Net models to alternative models fit on (1) age, sex, and standard ECG measures, and (2) clinical ECG-based rules for diagnosing LVH.
The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curve of LVH-Net by specific LVH etiology were cardiac amyloidosis 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93-0.97], hypertrophic cardiomyopathy 0.92 [95% CI, 0.90-0.94], aortic stenosis LVH 0.90 [95% CI, 0.88-0.92], hypertensive LVH 0.76 [95% CI, 0.76-0.77], and other LVH 0.69 [95% CI 0.68-0.71]. The single-lead models also discriminated LVH etiologies well.
An artificial intelligence-enabled ECG model is favorable for detection and classification of LVH and outperforms clinical ECG-based rules.
区分与左心室肥厚(LVH)相关的心脏疾病有助于诊断和临床护理。
评估基于人工智能的12导联心电图(ECG)分析是否有助于LVH的自动检测和分类。
我们使用一个预训练的卷积神经网络,从一个多机构医疗系统中患有与LVH相关心脏疾病的患者(n = 50,709)的12导联ECG波形中提取数字特征,这些疾病包括心脏淀粉样变性(n = 304)、肥厚型心肌病(n = 1056)、高血压(n = 20,802)、主动脉瓣狭窄(n = 446)和其他病因(n = 4766)。然后,我们使用逻辑回归(“LVH-Net”),根据年龄、性别和12导联数字特征,对有无LVH的LVH病因进行回归分析。为了评估深度学习模型在类似于移动ECG的单导联数据上的性能,我们还通过在12导联ECG的I导联(“LVH-Net Lead I”)或II导联(“LVH-Net Lead II”)上训练模型,开发了2个单导联深度学习模型。我们将LVH-Net模型的性能与基于(1)年龄、性别和标准ECG测量值,以及(2)基于临床ECG的LVH诊断规则拟合的替代模型进行比较。
特定LVH病因的LVH-Net在受试者操作特征曲线下的面积分别为:心脏淀粉样变性0.95 [95% CI,0.93 - 0.97],肥厚型心肌病0.92 [95% CI,0.90 - 0.94],主动脉瓣狭窄LVH 0.90 [95% CI,0.88 - 0.92],高血压性LVH 0.76 [95% CI,0.76 - 0.77],其他LVH 0.69 [95% CI 0.68 - 0.71]。单导联模型也能很好地区分LVH病因。
基于人工智能的ECG模型有利于LVH的检测和分类,且优于基于临床ECG的规则。